Fazlul Hasan Siddiqui, Md. Monjurul Islam, Sabah Binte Noorcs.AI
Effective response to multiple, simultaneously flooded areas requires coordinating appropriate actions in the correct temporal order, under severe resource constraints. Automated planning provides a foundation for addressing this challenge by generating time-aware schedules, given a formal description of available resources, constraints, and goals. This work presents an intelligent flood-response framework that exploits temporal planning and models the complete operational life cycle of flood response. The framework incorporates priority-driven triage, route accessibility and travel costs, resource allocation, and supply management, while also supporting mid-execution re-planning in response to unexpected environmental changes. The framework is formulated both in the Action Notation Modeling Language (ANML) and the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) 2.1, facilitating compatibility with a wider range of temporal planners. Experimental results establish the feasibility and scalability of the proposed framework, showing that flood response scenarios can be effectively modeled and solved using temporal planning, while providing guidance on planner selection.
AI planning is concerned with finding a sequence of actions that achieves a specified goal. It relies on explicit models of the world, commonly represented in the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL). An active line of research investigates how errors in such models can be detected and repaired. For example, users may provide positive test plans that are solutions, and negative test plans that fail during execution. Automated repair methods then modify the PDDL model to satisfy these constraints. In this paper, we evaluate the ability of recent open-weight large language models to perform this repair task using an LLM-only approach. Our experiments show that the symbolic baseline achieves an $F_1$ score of $.49$, while the best-performing LLM reaches $.87$ with high reasoning effort, an absolute improvement of $.38$. However, that setting has a mean test pass rate of only $.82$, falling to $.06$ on the Thoughtful domain; even the best setting that includes the test traces reaches only $.92$. Thus, current open-weight models cannot guarantee satisfaction of the test constraints required for reliable automated model repair.
In automated planning, logical regression is an operation that returns the most general condition necessary for an action to achieve a particular formula. It has many applications, such as allowing for more robust plan execution and providing compact policies for non-deterministic planning. Although relatively simple to calculate in basic planning settings, logical regression becomes significantly more complex when additional factors, such as axioms, are present. We introduce a methodology for approximating the logical regression of an action in a domain that includes axioms; an approximation that limits conditions to partial states. Our method produces minimal partial states while avoiding the recalculation of axioms. To demonstrate the impact of our methods, we embed our form of regression in an execution monitoring context, a well-established setting that can benefit greatly from logical regression. Our results show that this form of regression can dramatically generalize partial states across multiple domains, reducing the number of variables considered for execution monitoring by up to 70%, and demonstrate that the resulting execution monitor is robust enough to recover frequently in an environment with unexpected changes: several domains recover over 50% of the time in our tests.
Alfredo Garrachón Ruiz, Tomás de la Rosa, Daniel Borrajocs.SE cs.AI cs.CL
Version control systems are essential for collaborative software development, yet tools like git remain challenging for many practitioners. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising capabilities for interpreting developer intent, but their effectiveness in repository management tasks is limited by the need for formal reasoning. This work introduces Git-Assistant, an AI-based assistant that combines LLMs with automated planning to support developers in executing non-trivial git operations. The assistant analyzes repository context, translates natural language requests into actionable command sequences, and incorporates planning techniques to ensure correctness and safety. We present a systematic evaluation methodology using synthetic and randomized git environments, comparing the performance of LLM-only and planning-augmented variants across multiple metrics. Experimental results demonstrate that integrating formal reasoning with LLMs improves reliability and reduces errors in repository management, highlighting the potential of hybrid AI approaches for intelligent developer assistance.
Automated Planning is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI) where the main objective is generating a sequence of actions, known as a plan, that helps us reach a goal state from an initial state. A planning problem is defined by a set of objects, an initial state and a desired goal state. The objective is to compute a plan that'll lead us from the inital state to the goal state. Programs that generate plans are called planners. In this paper, we did a complementary study to the state-of-the-art LLM called PlanGPT which was released last year. We redid some experiments to verify whether planning with LLMs is \textbf{pertinent} and \textbf{worthwhile}. We also check whether the results obtained in the official PlanGPT paper for plan coverage were correct, and we also performed a more comprehensive study on PlanGPT's performance: in our paper PlanGPT's performance was evaluated using two metrics: Plan Cost and Plan Generation Time. The results of planGPT were compared to those produced by a traditional planner for the same plans and same metrics. We discovered that PlanGPT is no better than a Greedy search strategy.
Hamied Nabizada, Thomas Wirt, Luis Miguel Vieira da Silva +2cs.AI
Engineers designing production systems need to verify that a given layout supports all required production sequences. Automated planning techniques can answer such questions, but formulating the required planning problems in the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) demands specialized expertise that production engineers typically lack. Asset Administration Shells (AAS) have emerged as the standardized Digital Twin for industrial assets in Industry 4.0. We show that AAS capability models, structured using four established Industry 4.0 standards (VDI 3682 for process descriptions, IEC 61360-1 for semantic property qualification, IDTA 02011 for type hierarchies, and IDTA 02016 for instance descriptions), contain sufficient information to generate complete PDDL problems automatically. Unlike prior work that introduced PDDL-specific submodels, our approach derives all planning elements from domain-level descriptions of resource functions, so-called capabilities, allowing engineers to model capabilities without any exposure to PDDL syntax or planning concepts. Our extraction algorithm transforms distributed Multi-AAS architectures into complete PDDL planning problems. We validate the approach on AAS models of a laboratory production system, comparing four layout variants using optimal planning to demonstrate how engineers can systematically explore design trade-offs by modifying the AAS model and regenerating the planning domain