Generalization, memorization, and overfitting for diffusion models trained in the lazy high-dimensional regime

Modern score-based generative models have achieved remarkable empirical success in high-dimensional tasks such as image, audio, and video synthesis. These models reduce distribution learning to a sequence of regression problems that, if solved exactly on finite data, would ultimately reproduce the training samples. Their ability to generalize must therefore arise from the implicit or explicit regularization during training. In this work, we develop a generative counterpart to the theory of benign overfitting and algorithmic regularization for overparameterized neural networks in the supervised lazy-training regime. We study denoising score matching in a vector-valued reproducing kernel Hilbert space with an inner-product kernel. In the proportional high-dimensional regime $n\asymp d$, we derive exact risk trajectories under gradient flow training. These trajectories exhibit three phases governed by qualitatively distinct estimators: a spectral estimator that generalizes, a pure-noise score with localized peaks that interpolate the training objective, and an empirical Bayes estimator that memorizes the data. We then analyze how these estimators combine along the reverse-time SDE and characterize the distribution of the resulting samples. The analysis reveals familiar mechanisms from supervised learning, including kernel linearization and self-induced regularization from the nonlinear part of the kernel, but also reveals a distinct phenomenology specific to generative modeling.

(Mis)Understanding Benign Overfitting in Equity Return Prediction

Highly overparameterized models often predict well despite interpolating training data in complex domains, challenging the classical bias--variance tradeoff. We investigate whether this ``benign overfitting'' phenomenon extends to equity return prediction. Consistent with recent statistical theory, we document two key phenomena: first, a double descent pattern in the ridgeless model's prediction risk; and second, that while the optimal ridge model consistently outperforms its ridgeless counterpart, this performance gap becomes negligible at large parameter-to-observation ratios. Ultimately, however, both models fail to outperform a simple historical average. This empirical evidence aligns with our asymptotic results under the null hypothesis of zero slope coefficients, suggesting that standard equity predictors lack true forecasting power---even within highly flexible, nonlinear machine learning architectures. These findings reconcile modern and classical machine learning in asset pricing: in the absence of a true signal, they asymptotically collapse to the historical average benchmark.

High-dimensional ridgeless least squares interpolation under spiked covariance structures

This paper investigates the asymptotic behavior of the out-of-sample prediction risk of the high-dimensional ridgeless least-squares estimator when the feature dimension $p$ and the sample size $n$ grow proportionally. We consider a generalized spiked population covariance model with multiple latent factors, where the number of spiked eigenvalues may remain finite or increase with $n$, and the spiked eigenvalues may be bounded or diverge at arbitrary rates. Beyond characterizing the impact of covariance spectra, we reveal a new mechanism underlying benign overfitting: the prediction behavior of ridgeless interpolation is fundamentally governed by the alignment between the regression coefficient $\boldsymbolβ$ and the spiked eigenspaces of the population covariance matrix. In particular, we show that the signal energy distributed along latent spike directions determines whether interpolation leads to benign, tempered, or catastrophic overfitting. Our theoretical framework establishes sharp prediction risk limits under minimal moment conditions, requiring only finite fourth moments rather than Gaussianity. We characterize how the number, strength, and geometric structure of the spikes jointly influence the double-descent phenomenon. These results provide a unified understanding of when latent covariance structures facilitate or hinder generalization in overparameterized regression.

Investigation into In-Context Learning Capabilities of Transformers

Transformers have demonstrated a strong ability for in-context learning (ICL), enabling models to solve previously unseen tasks using only example input output pairs provided at inference time. While prior theoretical work has established conditions under which transformers can perform linear classification in-context, the empirical scaling behavior governing when this mechanism succeeds remains insufficiently characterized. In this paper, we conduct a systematic empirical study of in-context learning for Gaussian-mixture binary classification tasks. Building on the theoretical framework of Frei and Vardi (2024), we analyze how in-context test accuracy depends on three fundamental factors: the input dimension, the number of in-context examples, and the number of pre-training tasks. Using a controlled synthetic setup and a linear in-context classifier formulation, we isolate the geometric conditions under which models successfully infer task structure from context alone. We additionally investigate the emergence of benign overfitting, where models memorize noisy in-context labels while still achieving strong generalization performance on clean test data. Through extensive sweeps across dimensionality, sequence length, task diversity, and signal-to-noise regimes, we identify the parameter regions in which this phenomenon arises and characterize how it depends on data geometry and training exposure. Our results provide a comprehensive empirical map of scaling behavior in in-context classification, highlighting the critical role of dimensionality, signal strength, and contextual information in determining when in-context learning succeeds and when it fails.