ThermoLLM: Thermodynamics-Aware HVAC Control with Spatial-Semantic Knowledge Graph

Multi-zone HVAC control is a spatial decision problem in which indoor thermal evolution and control decisions depend not only on outdoor conditions and internal heat gains but also on zone layout, physical adjacency, and delayed thermal interactions across the building. Recent LLM-based HVAC controllers have shown that prompt-based control is feasible. However, these methods typically rely on task descriptions, observation values, short textual feedback, or unstructured retrieval, which limits their ability to reason about zone coupling, thermal response, and building dynamics. This paper presents a thermodynamics-aware LLM control framework for a five-zone EnergyPlus building simulation. The controller is grounded in a physics-informed spatial knowledge graph derived from Brick-style building semantics and linked with recent interaction history. At each control step, the model receives the current building state, graph-structured spatial context, and recent environment-controller history, enabling it to make decisions that reflect both building structure and short-term thermal evolution. We evaluate the framework against standard control baselines and several LLM-based alternatives. Results show that the proposed approach achieves the best overall energy-comfort trade-off and the lowest PMV violation while maintaining energy-efficient operation.

Quantifying the Energy Floor: Direct Measurement and Replay Buffer Bias in SAC-Based HVAC Control on sbsim

We quantify the energy floor -- the minimum achievable cost given action space constraints -- for Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) HVAC control on the sbsim calibrated building simulator. Through minimum-action experiments, we directly measure this floor at USD 35.51/day, dominated by continuous electrical loads (USD 35.44, 99.8%) with negligible gas consumption. The standard SAC baseline, initialized with schedule-policy replay buffer transitions, converges to USD 37.18/day, 4.7% above the floor. We identify buffer initialization as the dominant source of sub-optimality in this scenario: training from an empty buffer reduces cost to USD 35.57/day, eliminating 96% of the gap. Expanding the supply water temperature range by 10 K yields negligible additional savings (USD 0.03/day), and further expansion triggers physical constraint violations. We additionally uncover a discount factor coupling (gamma_eff = 0.891) shrinking the effective planning horizon from 8.3 h to 46 min -- a benchmark-wide issue warranting audit. Systematic ablation across planning horizon, reward weights, and observation enrichment confirms all pre-filled-buffer configurations cluster within 0.7% (USD 37.18--USD 37.42), demonstrating that equipment minimum power -- not algorithmic design -- imposes the binding constraint.