Learning from Lost Provenance: Multiple Instance Learning for Cancer Registry Tumor Group Classification

Modernizing cancer registries with deep learning is opening new opportunities to automate labor-intensive tasks such as the coding of pathology reports. However, progress is constrained by the scarcity of report-level human-annotated training data. Cancer registries generate substantial volumes of expert-assigned labels as a routine product of their operations, but these exist at the patient level and are not linked to the individual pathology reports that informed them, limiting their direct use for training models. We develop an efficient framework for training deep learning classifiers by leveraging these operationally-generated labels without requiring per-report human annotation, demonstrated for tumor group classification at the BC Cancer Registry. We use Attention-Based Multiple Instance Learning (ABMIL) to recover the lost link between patient-level labels and the reports that informed them, leveraging the attention the model places on each report to distil a large, noisily-labeled corpus into a compact, high-quality per-report training dataset. A classifier fine-tuned on a distilled dataset achieved a macro F1 of 0.83, outperforming established baselines across most tumor groups. By turning routine operational labels into high-quality training data without additional annotation or large-scale computing infrastructure, ABMIL offers a practical and accessible route to automating cancer registry workflows.

In-Domain Supervised Pathology Report Classification: A Reproducible Pipeline from Data Curation to Production-Matched Evaluation

We introduce an in-domain supervised pipeline designed to counter the out-of-distribution performance drop that hampers supervised biomedical NLP models, a problem observed when models trained on pathology reports are moved across cancer registries. Our contribution is a reproducible recipe for training a supervised classifier from routinely collected cancer registry data. It describes how to build the in-domain training set and a production-matched holdout, and to choose operating points that keep the false-negative rate (FNR) very low while keeping reviewer workload manageable. The pipeline standardizes data curation with facility-stratified sampling and separate handling of reports linked to registry cases, and includes a blinded manual audit to estimate positive-case prevalence and label noise. On a 418k-report holdout set, the Kentucky model achieved FNR 0.003 and false-positive rate (FPR) 0.097, improving over the Seattle-trained MOSSAIC OncoID baseline (FNR 0.010, FPR 0.183) and raising F1 from 0.860 to 0.922. In a blinded manual review of 600 reports, estimated positive prevalence declined from 0.500 to 0.398, indicating substantial label noise with errors concentrated in rare primary sites.