Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) object detection is critical for applications such as target search, where accurate detection of small objects in complex aerial scenes remains challenging. The limited spatial extent, dense distribution, and frequent occlusion of small objects make reliable candidate ranking particularly difficult. Existing Detection Transformer (DETR) based methods improve ranking by estimating localization quality from individual queries and incorporating it into classification scores. However, a single query often lacks sufficient geometric evidence for small objects with weak boundary cues, resulting in unreliable quality estimation and unstable ranking. To address this limitation, we propose Cross Layer Local Support and Consistency Calibration for DETR, termed CLSC DETR. Specifically, the Cross Layer Local Support module establishes correspondences between final layer queries and intermediate layer candidates to aggregate complementary geometric evidence for more reliable localization quality estimation, while the Classification and Localization Consistency Calibration module adaptively adjusts classification scores according to localization quality and classification reliability to improve candidate ranking. Experiments show that CLSC DETR improves AP and AP$_{75}$ over the baseline by 1.5\% and 2.0\% on VisDrone, respectively, while achieving consistent improvements on UAVDT.
Ranking systems used in decision-support settings should not only order candidates but also expose evidence that can be independently checked. We study evidence-certified candidate ranking: given an intent_id, a predefined plan skeleton, a window-local candidate roster, and text-derived candidate trajectories with span provenance, a system must output a Top-K list together with doc_id:span evidence certificates whose cited spans are sufficient to recover the decision. We instantiate this task on MAVEN-ERE and RAMS with fixed upstream extraction, window-local randomized candidate identifiers, skeleton-aligned trajectory supervision, hard negatives, and audit references. We introduce Evidence-Coupled Policy Optimization (ECPO), a listwise policy-optimization objective whose action is the joint object of ranking and evidence certificate. ECPO first learns an interpretable trajectory reward from skeleton alignment, argument consistency, and optional graph features; it then optimizes a constrained policy with three coupled rewards: listwise ranking utility, span-level certificate validity, and an evidence-cycle reward computed by a label-free deterministic verifier that reconstructs candidate support from claim-stripped cited spans. This reframes the goal from maximizing ordinary NDCG alone to maximizing CertNDCG and decision-evidence coupling. The evaluation compares ECPO against zero-shot, SFT, and GRPO policies, RM-only scoring with deterministic evidence attachment, grammar/JSON-constrained decoding, validator retry, best-of-N RM selection, and post-hoc evidence rationalization under closed-roster, predicted-roster, and hybrid-roster settings.