Diagnose, Then Refine: A Closed-Loop TTS System with AudioLLM-Guided Correction

Current TTS systems typically rely on open-loop, single-pass generation and can produce sporadic local prosodic defects, such as misplaced stress, unnatural pauses, or flattened intonation, that utterance-level metrics often fail to expose. We present LoopTTS, a judge-guided Filter-Judge-Refiner framework for recovering low-quality TTS outputs diagnosed by an AudioLLM. Given an initial utterance from a base TTS model, an AudioLLM Judge identifies salient prosodic issues and generates structured refine instructions; a Refiner, our fine-grained instruction-following TTS model, then performs guided expressive re-synthesis conditioned on the initial utterance, target text, and instruction. To train the Refiner, we construct Refiner-DB, a 42K-example AudioLLM-annotated dataset with word-level prosodic weak supervision. Human evaluation on diagnosed low-quality utterances shows that LoopTTS can detect perceptually salient errors and correct them with the Refiner, outperforming raw generated audio and practical open-loop re-generation baselines in recovery quality. The Refiner also demonstrates stronger instruction-following ability for stress and pause control in targeted prosody modification.

MLLM-DataEngine: Closing the Loop of Multimodal Instruction Tuning Data Generation

In this paper, we propose MLLM-DataEngine, a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop iteration, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyzes the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results, then generates a proper incremental dataset for the next training iteration, and enhances the model capability iteratively. Compared with previous instruction fine-tuning dataset collection methods which are separate from the benchmarking, MLLM-DataEngine shows better targeting and can improve MLLMs's capabilities more effectively. Firstly, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which can effectively analyze model weakness based on the benchmarking results and adjust the generation of incremental datasets flexibly. Secondly, in order to ensure high-quality data for specific capability types, the most representative in-context examples and abundant information are provided to GPT-4, which helps GPT-4 fully comprehend the model's weakness and further guarantees high-quality generated data. Through extensive experiments, we find MLLM-DataEngine could boost the MLLMs capability in a targeted and automatic manner without human participants. We hope MLLM-DataEngine could be a general solution for the following MLLMs data curation. Code, data, and model are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/MLLM-DataEngine.