Simultaneous inference of environmental and interaction forces in collective dynamics

Collective dynamics arise in a wide range of physical, biological, and engineering applications. Examples include cell migration, swarm robotics, social dynamics, and animal behavior. A defining characteristic of these systems is the emergence of large-scale coordination from local interactions among agents; a fundamental question is thus to understand the local interactions that give rise to the observed emergent dynamics. We are interested in methods for learning interactions generally, which can describe a wide class of physical systems exhibiting collective dynamics defined by an interaction kernel, without a priori assumptions on the analytical form of this kernel (i.e. it is nonparametric). The advantage of this kernel-based approach is that it incorporates the underlying physics of the model (i.e. collective dynamics), which more general equation-learning approaches may ignore, potentially limiting their effectiveness for model accuracy and predictions. In this work, we extend existing variational learning approaches to collective systems with both interaction kernels and environmental/intra-agent forces. The proposed framework simultaneously infers the interaction kernel non-parametrically while learning the environmental force using either semi-parametric or fully nonparametric representations. The methodology is validated on several benchmark models exhibiting synchronization, alignment, attraction-repulsion, and external environmental forces. We also introduce a model-selection procedure based on our nonparametric learning framework to identify models that optimally explain a given set of trajectory observations. By exploiting the feature-identification capability of the learned models, the proposed procedure can distinguish among different collective dynamics frameworks and recover mechanistic interaction mechanisms directly from trajectory data.

Infrared Universality of Collective Dynamics across Transformer and State-Space Architectures

Whether distinct neural architectures develop common collective dynamics remains an open question. Recent analysis of Transformer language models revealed a nearly flat, weakly infrared-enhanced time-scale density of states (TDOS) associated with near-marginal long-memory dynamics. Here we test whether a closely related organization emerges in Mamba, whose selective state-space dynamics provides a fundamentally different microscopic mechanism. Mamba allows relaxation dynamics to be resolved at three levels: the intrinsic spectrum of the learned state-space generator, its input-conditioned selective rescaling, and the collective TDOS of the complete block measured from its Jacobian. These spectra are not identical: selective dynamics and the remaining block transformations substantially reorganize the microscopic relaxation hierarchy. Nevertheless, the full block develops a reproducible slow-mode continuum whose infrared sector becomes progressively better resolved with increasing sequence length. Cumulative analysis yields $ρ(λ)\simλ^β$, with the long-sequence Mamba exponent stabilizing near $β_{\rm M}\simeq-0.17$. The corresponding memory dynamics follows $K(t)\sim t^{-(1+β)}$, close to the marginal $1/t$ regime. Despite fundamentally different microscopic dynamics, Transformer full-block spectra exhibit closely related infrared organization, with representative exponents of order $β_{\rm Tr}\sim-0.1$. These results separate explicit state-space memory from collective infrared organization and show that distinct sequence architectures can develop closely related near-marginal slow-mode dynamics. They extend infrared collective organization beyond Transformers and provide an independent test of the dynamical structure described by Cognitive Field Theory.

Same physical state, different collective dynamics: state encodings select synchronization outcomes in language-model agents

Language-model agents act on state encodings of their environment, yet these are treated as interchangeable interfaces. Using pretrained language models, we designed a circular-synchronization experiment applying a state-encoding intervention while holding the physical system fixed: each agent sees only a summary of its neighbours' relative phases and chooses to advance, stay or retard. Encoding that state as low-order circular moments rather than as a histogram selected different collective outcomes. In GPT the moment encoding synchronized the population in 6/6 seeds and the histogram encodings in 0/6; the effect replicated in Claude but reversed direction. Replaying identical fields shifted each agent's advance/stay/retard probabilities far beyond within-encoding repeat variation, in GPT, Claude and Gemini; in GPT, presentation alone shifted the operator with the moment values fixed. State encodings therefore form part of a model-dependent effective interaction law, not a neutral interface.

Temporal-Causal Unity as an Operational Framework for Collective Dynamics: Causal-Progress Clocks, Synchronization, and Polarization

This paper develops temporal-causal unity (TCU), a framework connecting a process-philosophical thesis -- time is the ordered unfolding of causal change -- to an operational model of cognitive and social dynamics. The framework deliberately separates three claims: an interpretive thesis about becoming, a measurable causal-progress coordinate, and a stochastic network model. Causal progress is defined by $τ(t)=\int_0^tλ(s\mid\mathcal H_s)\,{\rm d}s$, where the nonnegative event intensity $λ$ must be specified independently of the outcome. Agents carry an orientation phase and an activation amplitude; weighted interaction, heterogeneous drift, external input, anchoring, and diffusion govern their evolution in $τ$. First- and second-harmonic order parameters separate consensus from bipolar polarization. For the all-to-all noisy Kuramoto special case with Lorentzian drift width $Δ$, synchronization begins at the conditional threshold $K_c = 2(Δ+ D)$, not at a universal constant. Reproducible numerical illustrations illustrate (not empirically demonstrate) this threshold, causal-clock curve collapse, and the consensus-polarization distinction. Six historical episodes are treated as scope probes rather than validation data. The paper derives falsifiable hypotheses and an out-of-sample protocol for comparing causal-progress and chronological-time models. TCU is therefore offered as a disciplined bridge between process ontology and complex-systems modeling, not as a replacement for spacetime physics or as an empirically established identity between time and causation.