Color naming is influenced not only by physical color values but also by the semantic context in which colors are used. This paper investigates context-dependent color naming by mapping color-name datasets from Cosmetics, Crayola, and Car-color vocabularies onto the 86 fuzzy color categories of the COLIBRI color model. Contextual variation is analyzed using category coverage, Shannon entropy, and maximum lift. The results show that the three contexts occupy the COLIBRI color space differently: Cosmetics covers 48 of 86 fuzzy categories, Crayola covers 50, and Car colors cover 40. The results demonstrated that Crayola provides the broadest and most balanced use of the fuzzy color space, Cosmetics is mainly concentrated around warm-tone regions, and Car colors are more specialized around blue and achromatic regions. These findings show that color naming cannot be fully explained by numerical color similarity alone and that semantic context plays an important role in human color interpretation. The proposed framework supports the development of context-aware color models for design analytics, product search, recommendation systems, and human-centered artificial intelligence.
Color naming is an important part of human color perception. Its task is to allow people to describe continuous colors using discrete color categories. However, the boundaries between color categories are often unclear, and some colors may be perceived differently depending on their saturation and brightness. While certain color categories remain recognizable across a wide range of shades, others may be associated with different color names when their appearance changes. This study investigates the consistency of color naming for red, yellow, and green color categories using a free color-naming experiment. A set of 18 color samples was selected from the COLIBRI dataset to represent different shades of these colors. Participants (n = 92) were asked to freely assign color names to each sample in Kazakh, Russian, or English without being limited to predefined categories. The results show that color categories differ in their consistency. Green shades were consistently identified as green despite variations in appearance, whereas yellow shades received a wider variety of names, including gold- and brown-related descriptions. Red shades showed moderate naming consistency. Our findings suggest that some color categories occupy broader perceptual regions than others and may therefore be more robust to visual variations. The study results can be used to develop perceptually meaningful color models and color naming systems.
David Serrano-Lozano, Luis Herranz, Michael S. Brown +1cs.CV cs.AI
Enhancing images to make them visually appealing is a persistent challenge in computer vision. Many deep-learning methods train models on paired datasets to replicate expert editing styles. However, these approaches struggle with two key issues: (1) interpretability and (2) a parametrization suitable for user adjustments. To address these challenges, we present NamedCurves+, an approach inspired by the concept of Color Naming, a universal set of familiar colors widely used in software tools for intuitive editing. Our method integrates color names into a learning-based framework, enabling global adjustments for each named color through tone curves. To address local image variations, we incorporate a transformer block that captures spatial dependencies, enabling context-aware edits across the image. NamedCurves+ enhances the retouching process's interpretability and supports user interaction, allowing flexible modifications of individual tone curves to refine the retouched image according to personal preferences. Extensive experiments on tasks such as image retouching, tone mapping, and exposure correction demonstrate that NamedCurves+ outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Notably, our approach is both explainable, as the tone curves explicitly represent how each color name contributes to the enhancement, and interactive, allowing users to customize the retouching process and achieve results tailored to their liking.
Modeling the emergence of human-like lexicons in computational systems has advanced through the use of interacting neural agents, which simulate both learning and communicative pressures. The NeLLCom-Lex framework (Zhang et al., 2025) allows neural agents to develop pragmatic color naming behavior and human-like lexicons through supervised learning (SL) from human data and reinforcement learning (RL) in referential games. Despite these successes, the lexicons that emerge diverge systematically from human color categories, producing highly non-convex regions in color space, which contrast with the convexity typical of human categories. To address this, we introduce two factors, upsampling rare color terms during SL and multi-listener RL interactions, and adopt a convexity measure to quantify geometric coherence. We find that upsampling improves lexical diversity and system-level informativeness of the color lexicon, while many-listener setups promote more convex color categories. The combination of moderate upsampling and multiple listeners produces lexicons most similar to human systems.