3D scene understanding is increasingly important in construction, yet most methods are developed on curated datasets that do not fully reflect real site sensing conditions. In many workflows, individual LiDAR scans provide rapid local updates rather than complete scene representations, producing limited surface coverage, acquisition-driven density variation, and severe imbalance between dominant planar surfaces and sparse construction elements. Because large point clouds must be downsampled, sampling resolution and point allocation directly affect the balance between geometric detail and spatial context. This study evaluates these effects under a fixed per-fragment point budget and introduces an incidence-aware sampling strategy for individual LiDAR scans. The method maps points to a geometry-normalized manifold space for voxel-based selection while preserving original Euclidean coordinates for downstream learning. It requires only point coordinates and normals and no backbone modification. Using the Site in Pieces (SIP) benchmark, experiments with Point Transformer and PointNeXt show improved resolution-averaged segmentation performance, especially for non-planar elements and ladders, while reducing sensitivity to sampling resolution. The results show that acquisition-aware sampling can provide a more stable geometric representation and should be treated as an active component of individual-scan 3D segmentation rather than generic preprocessing.
Prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction moves most building work into module factories, whose production floor operates as a flexible job shop. A major complication is decisive: long post-operation time-lags caused by concrete curing, watertightness ponding tests, and paint drying, during which a module is blocked while its workstation stays free. On benchmark instances grounded in an official national prefabrication guidebook, these lags inflate even the optimal reference makespan by about 67% on average, and ignoring them at decision time, then repairing to feasibility, is worse than every dispatching rule. We adapt a state-of-the-art dual-attention deep reinforcement learning solver through three minimally invasive, individually ablatable extensions: lag-aware dynamics with an admissible reward bound, two anticipatory lag feature channels, and liveness-masked operation- and station-type embeddings. With every extension disabled the implementation reproduces the original solver exactly, so all gains are attributable to the adaptations. We release a public, guidebook-grounded benchmark generator. On held-out instances the learned policy is the strongest solver-free scheduler: it reaches within about 4% of a constraint-programming reference and beats every dispatching rule and a genetic-algorithm metaheuristic, with its advantage widening under capacity contention, and a single size-mixed policy carries this lead across the trained range of factory sizes. It needs no solver, model, or license in the loop and re-plans within seconds of a disruption; where an exact solver can be deployed, that solver remains the quality ceiling, a boundary we map explicitly.