Real-world image super-resolution (Real-ISR) aims to reconstruct high-quality (HQ) images from low-quality (LQ) inputs subject to diverse real-world degradations. Recent advances have leveraged the LQ inputs and natural image priors learned by Stable Diffusion models to achieve impressive results. However, existing methods often overlook insufficient clarity of LQ inputs inevitably induce content drift in the generated HQ images. This manifests primarily as visual detail degradation and textual semantic shift, severely compromising both fidelity and perceptual quality. To address this challenge, we propose FSP-Diff, a novel one-step diffusion model featuring a dual-pathway architecture. This architecture comprises a Detail-Conditioned Pathway for injecting structured details to recover fine structures, and a Detail-Modulated Semantic Pathway that refines semantic guidance using structured details to mitigate semantic deviations. Extensive experiments on standard Real-ISR benchmarks demonstrate that FSP-Diff surpasses existing one-step diffusion methods in both quantitative and qualitative metrics.
Training-free acceleration makes diffusion-based multimodal large language models (dMLLMs) more deployable, but it may silently change generated content. We study this serving-time consistency problem on 300 real images, comparing Fast-dLLM outputs with the same model's unaccelerated outputs. Across the mild parallelism induced in our long-form setting (1.05--1.25 committed tokens per step), confidence-threshold tuning changes decoding behavior but not baseline agreement. State-refresh ablations and an image-swap intervention instead identify stale visual and generated-text states as contributors to drift. For the tested Fast-dLLM implementation, shortening the KV-cache refresh interval yields a monotonic speed--agreement frontier and near-exact agreement at a measured 1.3x speedup. The initial diagnosis also appears with dLLM-Cache and LaViDa, although dLLM-Cache recovers agreement only after both caches are tightened, which removes its speed advantage. Independent prompts and images reproduce the threshold-insensitivity and refresh recovery. A targeted audit finds genuine content substitution in half of 50 low-agreement pairs. In a separate blinded two-annotator evaluation, the pooled accelerated-minus-baseline factual-error difference is 0.00 (95% CI [-0.17,+0.17]); this sample detects no difference but does not establish factual equivalence. Finally, none of the tested adaptive or smoothed-refresh variants beats the fixed interval at matched compute. Our contribution is a paired diagnostic and an implementation-scoped consistency control, not an accuracy or safety guarantee.