Existing driver intervention systems rely on auditory alerts and fixed templates, failing to leverage multi-task recognition outputs. General-purpose metrics such as BLEU and BERTScore cannot capture intervention-specific quality dimensions including risk-urgency alignment, cognitive load, and driver acceptability. In this paper, we propose the Driver Safety-Aware Intervention Score (DSAIS), a domain-specific metric evaluating five dimensions through a hybrid architecture combining lightweight rule-based computation with LLM Judge evaluation, together with an end-to-end framework integrating four-task recognition outputs into an LLM through risk fusion, state history management, and dynamic prompt construction. Experiments on the AIDE dataset with five models and seven conditions demonstrate that DSAIS achieves ICC 0.798-0.840 across three architecturally distinct judges and Cohen's d > 1.5 across all control conditions. Multi-dimensional sub-score analysis quantifies the contextual adaptability gap between rule-based and LLM-based systems, revealing that multi-task integration improves contextual relevance by 9.1% over rule-based baselines. Ablation experiments demonstrate that each framework component contributes to contextual relevance, with sub-score decomposition revealing gains that aggregate scoring masks. Driver emotion recognition is identified as the most critical upstream factor, and compact local LLMs (7B--9B parameters) achieve quality superior to API-based models, providing practical design guidelines for in-vehicle deployment.
Driver emotions can affect risk perception, decision-making, and vehicle control under complex road conditions. Existing studies mainly focus on driver emotion recognition, while limited attention has been given to context-aware intervention that jointly considers driver emotion and road perception. This paper proposes a safety-prioritized multimodal driver assistance framework that analyzes speech-derived emotional cues and visual road conditions to generate structured driving interventions. The framework first provides road safety reminders and then generates emotion-aligned verbal support. We construct a multimodal dataset by aligning emotional speech signals with structured road environment descriptors and introduce the CARE (Context-Aware Road-Emotion Evaluation) score to jointly evaluate emotion recognition, risk identification, and intervention generation. Experimental results show that the proposed framework balances environmental risk reporting and emotion-aware verbal regulation, providing a feasible safety-driven direction for intelligent transportation systems.