Training-Free Action Correction for VLA Model Failures via Language Feedback

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate strong semantic understanding yet exhibit systematic failures during deployment. The conditions under which these failures occur, and whether they can be corrected without retraining, remain poorly understood. In this paper, we take steps toward addressing this gap. We present CorrectVLA, a framework that translates task-level natural language corrections into additive action magnitude adjustments without modifying policy weights. A human provides a single task-level correction, applied uniformly across all rollouts without per-episode intervention. In simulation, CorrectVLA recovers execution misalignment failures across both in-distribution and OOD tasks. In real-robot experiments on a UFactory xArm7 under environment shift, CorrectVLA restores near-perfect success where the base policy almost entirely breaks down, generalizing across object locations and identities. Through a taxonomy of failure modes on LIBERO-90, we find that execution misalignment failures, where the policy reaches the correct target but miscalibrates action magnitudes, represent the correctable subset, while other failure modes where semantic comprehension itself breaks down are not amenable to this approach. The approach succeeds when policies possess strategic correctness and fails when fundamental comprehension is absent, establishing a practical operational boundary for inference-time correction.

RedFlow: Redirect Failure into Action-Level Corrections for Flow-matching VLA Policy

Flow-matching Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies have shown strong potential for robotic manipulation but often suffer from compounding errors caused by distribution shifts during deployment. While offline reinforcement learning (RL) provides a practical way to improve deployed policies using rollout data, existing methods either ignore failure data or exploit it only at the trajectory level, resulting in low learning efficiency and persistent errors. We propose **RedFlow**, a fine-grained offline RL framework that redirects failure experiences into action-level corrective supervision for flow-matching VLA policies. RedFlow consists of two key components: (1) a **Context-Aware Corrective Matching** mechanism that identifies failure-inducing actions and retrieves successful alternatives from similar contexts as corrective targets, and (2) an **Adaptive Redirection Objective** that jointly reinforces successful actions, suppresses undesirable ones, and redirects recoverable failures toward corrective targets. By converting both successful and failed experiences into dense supervision, RedFlow enables robust recovery learning from mixed-quality data. Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark and three real-world manipulation tasks show that RedFlow consistently outperforms state-of-the-art offline RL baselines, improving the real-world success rate from 56.7% to 74.7%. It also matches strong on-policy methods (PPO, GRPO, and DDPO) while requiring roughly an order of magnitude fewer training samples.