When More Modalities Hurt: Modality Dropout for Heavy-Duty Vehicle Engine Diagnostics

Heavy-duty vehicle diagnostics generate three disconnected data modalities: unstructured multi- lingual service complaints, high-dimensional sensor telemetry with over 80% missing values, and Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs). We investigate whether fusing these modalities improves engine component classification on a proprietary dataset from a major truck manufacturer. Through 5-fold cross-validation across multiple model configurations spanning three model families on five engine component classes (885 samples, the full cross-database matched population for this manufacturer), we find that naive fusion provides modest gains over text alone (65.3%). However, modality dropout during training, which randomly disables entire modalities per batch, forces the network to exploit weaker inputs and achieves 68.8% accuracy on text+DTC fusion (weighted F1: 0.67), a 3.5-point improvement over text-only (65.3%, weighted F1: 0.64) and the best result across all methods including logistic regression and gradient-boosted trees. Per-class analysis shows that the dominant modality varies by fault type: text describes symptoms, DTCs encode structured fault signals, and sensors measure physical state. On intake/exhaust faults, sensors alone reach 93% where text achieves 80%. On fuel system faults, fusion with modality dropout nearly triples accuracy from 15% to 38% over text alone. To our knowledge, this is the first application of three-way modality fusion combining text, sensors, and fault codes in industrial vehicle diagnostics.

A Standardized Framework for Machine Learning in Power System Protection

Studies of machine-learning-based power-system protection increasingly report near-perfect scores, yet the meaning of those scores depends strongly on the evaluation setting. Protection task, physical scope, measurements, timing, targets, preprocessing, and validation often vary jointly and remain incompletely specified. This paper proposes a standardization-oriented framework that treats evaluation design as part of the scientific contribution. It defines seven required study dimensions: protection objective, physical scope, observability, timing and decision windows, targets and sample validity, validation protocol, and evaluation outputs. The framework is instantiated in a bounded case study on the public PROTECT-90 electromagnetic-transient benchmark, comprising 9022 simulated episodes from a 90 kV double-line topology, for onset-conditioned fault classification and localization. Under centralized sensing, simulation-metadata-aligned 20 ms windows, and episode-grouped validation, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) achieved a five-fold mean macro-averaged F1 score of 0.991 +/- 0.001 for classification and a localization mean absolute error of 10.20 +/- 0.25% of line length (mean +/- std across episode-grouped folds). Extending the decision horizon to 50 ms preserved this task-dependent performance asymmetry, while reduced observability approximately doubled the MLP localization error but had little effect on classification. A synchronized two-ended conventional locator outperformed the learning locators under its richer clean information set, and measurement degradation showed that clean predictive performance did not determine robustness. The framework turns evaluation assumptions into explicit, reproducible evidence and provides a basis for more comparable, auditable evaluation and future certification-oriented assessment of machine-learning protection functions.

Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture for Solar PV Panel Fault Classification

The rapid expansion of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems has increased the need for reliable and scalable fault classification, as manual inspection is impractical at scale. Thermal infrared (IR) imaging provides a non-contact solution for identifying PV faults; however, accurate classification remains challenging due to class imbalance, limited texture information, and subtle thermal differences. In this work, we investigate the applicability of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) for thermal IR PV fault classification across various scenarios and propose JEFFNet (JEPA-EFFicientNet), a multibranch architecture that combines JEPA-based self-supervised representation learning with EfficientNetV2-S-based supervised convolutional feature extraction. JEFFNet fuses semantic representations from a JEPA-pretrained Vision Transformer with convolutional features from EfficientNetV2-S, enabling complementary feature learning. JEFFNet is evaluated on two public thermal IR datasets, PVF-10 and InfraredSolarModules (ISM), for both multiclass and derived binary (healthy/faulty) classification. On PVF-10, JEFFNet achieves an F1-score of $93.21$ and an accuracy of $94.33$ in the 10-class task, and an F1-score of $97.53$ and an accuracy of $96.41$ in the derived 2-class task. On ISM, JEFFNet achieves an F1-score of $72.60$ and an accuracy of $83.88$ in the 12-class task, and an F1-score of $94.69$ and an accuracy of $94.78$ in the derived 2-class task. JEFFNet also uses only 108.6M parameters versus 205.91M for GEPFNet, a 47.2\% reduction. These results demonstrate that combining self-supervised semantic and supervised convolutional features provides an effective, parameter-efficient solution for thermal IR PV fault classification. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Azimi2kht/JEFFNet