Feasible but Not Safe: Constraint Violations and Report-Channel Attacks in Learned Cell-Free ISAC Association

Learning-based schedulers have been proposed to provide real-time user, target, and access point (AP) association in distributed cell-free integrated sensing and communication systems. In a typical approach, a graph neural network (GNN), trained on labels from a mixed-integer linear program, maps lightweight per-AP statistics to decisions on AP clustering, user and target scheduling, and mode selection in one forward pass. Such solutions assume that hard constraints, enforced only as soft training penalties, hold at inference, and that the self-reported statistics are truthful. Using our ASSENT algorithm as an example, we find that despite high $F_1$ scores, many solutions violate at least one hard constraint, demonstrating that high prediction accuracy does not ensure joint feasibility. Projecting the GNN output onto a feasible solution restores constraint satisfaction with low utility loss, even with a simple greedy repair procedure. We further show that feasibility alone does not guarantee robustness to false data injection attacks. A single malicious AP that reports false information cannot substantially increase its user associations, but can greatly increase the rate of infeasible solutions. The effect of such attacks depends on the type of information being falsified. Misreporting information that affects the objective can largely be mitigated through feasibility projection, whereas falsifying information that affects the constraints cannot. The latter can, however, be detected using a low-complexity cross-AP consistency check. These results show that learned ISAC schedulers should be evaluated using constraint-aware feasibility metrics in addition to conventional accuracy measures.

The sharp SAT/UNSAT phase transition in random ellipsoid fitting

Let $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ be independent standard Gaussian vectors in $\mathbb{R}^d$. An \emph{ellipsoid fit} is a matrix $S \succeq 0$ such that $x_i^\top S x_i =d$ for every $i$, so that all the points lie on the boundary of the centered ellipsoid $\{ x : x^\top S x = d\}$. Saunderson, Parrilo and Willsky conjectured that, as $n,d \to \infty$, this semidefinite feasibility problem undergoes a sharp transition at $n \sim d^2/4$. We prove this conjecture. If $\lim \sup n/d^2 = α^* <1/4$, then, with probability tending to one, an ellipsoid fit exists; moreover, one can choose $S$ with all eigenvalues in a fixed interval $[λ_- , λ_+] \subset (0,\infty)$ depending only on $α^*$. Conversely, if $\lim \inf n/d^2 > 1/4$, then, with probability tending to one, no ellipsoid fit exists, without any spectral restriction. Our proof builds on the Gaussian-equivalence framework developed by Bandeira and Maillard (2025) and closes the two gaps left open in their work: establishing exact fitting and removing the operator-norm constraint. On the satisfiable side, the new ingredients are a head-tail decomposition of the dual vector, exact correction of the sparse head constraints, and a Gaussian comparison principle for the low-influence tail. On the unsatisfiable side, we split a candidate into a low-rank spectral head and a Schatten-3 diffuse bulk, Gaussianize the bulk conditionally on the head, and apply a projected Gordon escape argument. The threshold is governed by the statistical dimension $d(d+1)/4$ of the positive semidefinite cone.

Diverse and Plausible Algorithmic Recourse via Tractable Recourse Distributions

Algorithmic recourse seeks to help individuals reverse unfavorable automated decisions by recommending actionable changes that achieve a desired outcome. As an individual usually has several distinct routes to a favorable decision, and different people can act on different ones, a recourse system should offer multiple realistic alternatives rather than one. Existing approaches formulate recourse as an optimization problem that constructs one or a small set of counterfactuals rather than modeling the underlying space of feasible solutions, and in practice each sacrifices diversity, plausibility, or feasibility to secure the others. We propose Tractable Recourse Distributions, a probabilistic framework that represents the space of feasible alternatives for a given factual instance as a probability distribution over favorable outcomes. For commonly used cost functions based on proximity and the number of feature changes, we show that this distribution admits an exact representation as a probabilistic circuit, obtained by exponentially tilting the circuit; each individual's distribution is therefore available in closed form, without retraining the model. Sampling from these distributions naturally produces diverse and plausible recourses, while the tilting parameters provide explicit control over their proximity and sparsity. Experiments on standard algorithmic recourse benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework attains diversity, plausibility, and feasibility simultaneously, while retaining sufficient probability mass over feasible counterfactuals for rejection sampling to be practical. A visual study on MNIST illustrates how the tilt strength trades proximity against validity.

GraphBU: MILP Instance Generation with Graph-Native Block Units

Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) instances used for solver development are hard to obtain when models come from private or application-specific pipelines. A generator must keep the structure that solvers and learned policies rely on. Existing general generators usually choose their generation unit from a formulation template, summary statistics, local graph edits, or blocks found after recombination. These units do not explicitly record how a local part of the MILP is coupled to the rest of the instance. We propose GraphBU, a graph-native generator whose basic unit is a local subproblem plus its interface. The method promotes coupling nodes into master constraints or boundary variables and uses the resulting block units for compatibility-checked replacement. The analysis focuses on the properties needed by this construction: promotion separates interfaces, replacement can preserve feasibility under an interface-slack condition, and the graph construction is invariant to row-column permutations. On MILP instances generation, this unit keeps graph statistics close to the source family, preserves feasibility on most datasets, and improves downstream Predict-and-Search training. Genrated by GraphBU, The average graph-statistical similarity was approximately 0.934, the average feasibility was approximately 96.7%, and the average increase in the main index of downstream PS was approximately 8.0%.

EngiAgent: Fully Connected Coordination of LLM Agents for Solving Open-ended Engineering Problems with Feasible Solutions

Engineering problem solving is central to real-world decision-making, requiring mathematical formulations that not only represent complex problems but also produce feasible solutions under data and physical constraints. Unlike mathematical problem solving, which operates on predefined formulations, engineering tasks demand open-ended analysis, feasibility-driven modeling, and iterative refinement. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in reasoning and code generation, they often fail to ensure feasibility, which limits their applicability to engineering problem solving. To address this challenge, we propose EngiAgent, a multi-agent system with a fully connected coordinator that simulates expert workflows through specialized agents for problem analysis, modeling, verification, solving, and solution evaluation. The fully connected coordinator enables flexible feedback routing, overcoming the rigidity of prior pipeline-based reflection methods and ensuring feasibility at every stage of the process. This design not only improves robustness to diverse failure cases such as data extraction errors, constraint inconsistencies, and solver failures, but also enhances the overall quality of problem solving. Empirical results across four representative domains demonstrate that EngiAgent achieves substantial improvements in feasibility compared to prior approaches, establishing a new paradigm for feasibility-oriented engineering problem solving with LLMs. Our source code and data are available at https://github.com/AI4Engi/EngiAgent.