SLAPBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Four-Finger SLAP Fingerprint Verification

Four-finger SLAP fingerprints are flat live-scan impressions of the index, middle, ring, and little fingers of one hand, used for identity verification in border control and law enforcement. No benchmark has evaluated whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can verify identity from SLAP images. We introduce SLAPBench, the first benchmark for MLLM-based four-finger SLAP fingerprint verification, built from NIST SD302b with 7,832 pairs (176 mated, 7,656 non-mated). We evaluate four open-source MLLMs (InternVL3-8B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B, Qwen3-VL-8B, Gemma-3-12B) and the proprietary Claude Opus 4.8 under zero-shot, task-description, and similarity-scoring prompts. Prompting governs verification behavior. Task-description prompting collapses all four open-source models to near-100% False Accept Rate (FAR), and Gemma-3-12B collapses under zero-shot as well; Claude Opus 4.8 alone resists collapse under both binary prompts, giving the best binary result (FAR = 20.2%). Similarity scoring removes collapse across the open-source models and exposes wide capability gaps: Claude reaches AUC = 0.953 and Gemma-3-12B 0.837, while InternVL3-8B is inverted (AUC = 0.590) and Qwen2.5-VL-7B near random (0.567). Qwen3-VL-8B attains perfect separation (AUC = 1.000), which we treat as a diagnostic rather than as capability: SD302b holds one SLAP capture per finger position, so mated pairs are cross-resolution. A matched-resolution control leaves the perfect score intact, ruling out the resolution shortcut; what cannot be excluded within SD302b is near-duplicate detection, since a mated pair is one capture rendered twice. A fairness probe over gender, race, and age suggests disparity grows as discrimination weakens. SLAPBench establishes the first SLAP-specific MLLM baseline and shows that prompting governs collapse while model capability governs discrimination.

Topological summaries of fingerprint ridge patterns carry identity information

Fingerprints are the most widely deployed biometric. Verifying whether two impressions come from the same finger typically relies on minutiae, small landmarks such as skin ridge endings and bifurcations. These landmarks are extracted through a multi-stage pipeline of image enhancement, skeletonization, minutiae detection, and alignment. We investigate an alternative: using topological data analysis to represent the full pattern of skin ridges and valleys directly, bypassing minutiae detection and the downstream matching pipeline. We apply persistent homology, a topological tool that tracks how loops in the ridge pattern form and fill in across spatial scales, producing multi-scale summaries of ridge geometry. We develop and compare a range of verification methods on a standard benchmark dataset, FVC2000 DB1. Even the simplest topological summaries, with no trained parameters, substantially outperform geometry-only baselines. A trained method achieves an AUC of 0.91, while an optimal-transport method excels at the strictest false-accept thresholds, suggesting they capture different aspects of the ridge pattern. Fusing these two approaches yields the best performance at every low false-accept threshold we examine. Our results establish that these topological summaries capture substantial fingerprint identity information, far more effective for verification than raw pixel-level geometry. Because the entire pipeline is openly specified, it offers a transparent complement to minutiae-based systems, and we provide a modular framework for constructing, evaluating, and combining topological verification methods.