Giacomo Rizzieri, Saif-Ur-Rehman, Jörg F. Unger +1cs.CE cs.AI cs.LG math.NA
The geometric morphology of deposited filaments can significantly influence the structural performance and stability of 3D concrete-printed (3DCP) structures. However, most finite element (FEM)-based approaches for buildability assessment represent printed layers as simplified rectangles, potentially limiting predictive accuracy. This study proposes a geometry-informed modelling framework that integrates the deep-learning-based filament shape prediction tool ShapeGen3DCP with a layer-activation FEM approach to investigate the effect of realistic filament geometries on buildability. The framework generates geometry-aware numerical models directly from material and process parameters, eliminating the need for experimental filament characterization or computationally intensive fluid-flow simulations. Validation against experimental data and a parametric study of rectilinear walls demonstrate that extrusion parameters and the resulting filament geometry can significantly influence buildability predictions. Realistic filament representations are particularly important for free-flow deposition, whereas layer-pressing strategies are less sensitive to geometric simplifications. Among the investigated representations, an elliptical approximation provides an effective balance between geometric fidelity and modelling simplicity. When rectangular representations are preferred to enable regular computational meshes for faster simulations, defining their dimensions based on volume conservation improves prediction reliability compared with calibrating them using either the maximum filament width or the interlayer contact width. Overall, the proposed methodology demonstrates the importance of incorporating filament geometry into 3DCP simulations and provides practical guidance for selecting efficient and accurate geometric representations for buildability assessment.
Madina Kojanazarova, Sidaty El Hadramy, Philippe C. Cattincs.AI cs.CG cs.CV
Accurate soft tissue simulation is essential for surgical training, pre-operative planning, and haptic feedback systems. While learning-based surrogate models trained on data using the finite element method (FEM) offer a promising path to real-time inference, their reliability depends on well-calibrated constitutive models. Existing approaches neither provide systematic guidance on model selection across stiffness levels, nor generalize across different tissue stiffnesses or geometries. We perform a comprehensive calibration of hyperelastic constitutive models in the SOFA Framework using gravity-loaded silicone beams with different stiffnesses. Using calibrated simulations as training data, we use a softness conditioned equivariant graph neural network, enabling deformation and force prediction across multiple tissue types and unseen geometries. Our model achieves sub-millimeter mean deformation accuracy at 0.010s inference time, while showing that force prediction quality is directly tied to upstream calibration consistency.
This work evaluates surrogate-assisted optimization of a seven-parameter current-excited coil--core benchmark subject to geometric, manufacturing, and separate core and copper mass constraints. A Python--MPh--COMSOL workflow couples a two-dimensional axisymmetric finite-element method (FEM) model to a Matern 5/2 Gaussian-process (GP) probabilistic surrogate. Here, physics-constrained denotes a design problem evaluated by a governing-equation FEM model and restricted by explicit physical, geometric, manufacturing, and material-allocation constraints; it does not denote a physics-informed GP architecture. Sequential Bayesian optimization (BO) ranks candidates using expected improvement (EI), and every reported incumbent is verified by FEM. Five paired runs show that optimizer ranking depends on the available FEM-evaluation budget: EI--BO improves rapidly at small continuation budgets, COBYLA is stronger at the earliest checkpoint, and BOBYQA attains the highest mean terminal response. A retrospective finite-pool study further finds no robust endpoint advantage of EI over posterior-mean ranking on this smooth response surface. The broader result is that early progress, terminal response, information use, and wall-clock cost can favor different methods in simulation-driven design. A selected-design check at a common total current preserves the observed BOBYQA--COBYLA--EI-BO ordering. The conclusions nevertheless remain conditional on this axisymmetric benchmark and do not establish a fixed-current optimum, fixed-power performance, or electrical-efficiency superiority.
Extending the neural-operator element method from individually trained, fixed-geometry neural elements to a library of reusable, geometry-parameterized element types fails structurally: a field-predicting operator trained by value regression induces an energy whose assembled Hessian is indefinite, and Newton converges to spurious minima (247% error) even with 1%-accurate field predictions. We introduce convex neural energy elements: each element exports a scalar energy E(g,U), architecturally convex in its boundary degrees of freedom U and smoothly parameterized by its geometry g, realized as a hypernetwork-generated positive-semidefinite quadratic form (an input-convex correction is reserved for non-quadratic physics). A regularization-nullspace principle--the regularizer's nullspace must contain the physics nullspace--removes an otherwise irreducible bias, and assembled elements inherit the classical guarantee that singular element stiffnesses yield a positive-definite global system. We prove conditional error bounds (energy-to-solution accuracy, element-count scaling, geometry generalization) and verify each experimentally. On heat conduction with elliptic holes, one trained element assembles into 2x2 to 8x8 grids and an L-shaped layout of unseen geometries at 0.6-1.0% relative L2 error, with 175x faster per-geometry setup for boundary-quantity workloads. A second trained element type mixes freely with the first in one monolithic assembly, and a three-dimensional instantiation reaches 0.23% on eight-element assemblies--the guarantees are type- and dimension-agnostic. A plane-strain elasticity element, whose physics nullspace is three-dimensional, lands on the analytically predicted regularization floors. Making the energy the learned object turns neural operators from single-use surrogates into reusable elements that inherit the assembly guarantees of the method they extend.
Accurate prediction of stress and strain fields in hierarchical composite microstructures is critical for physics-informed material design, yet conventional finite element method (FEM) simulations are computationally prohibitive at scale, requiring minutes to days per evaluation. In this work, we propose a hybrid UNet-Transformer architecture that predicts complex mechanical field distributions directly from composite microstructure geometry images, serving as an efficient surrogate for FEM across ten distinct stress and strain field types spanning diverse two-phase composite configurations including square, hexagonal, and triangular tessellations, multiple boundary conditions, and high-resolution geometries. Results demonstrate that the proposed architecture achieves strong predictive performance across the majority of subdatasets, with peak accuracy on periodic tessellation geometries reaching R2=0.9991, SSIM=0.9936, and MAE=0.0050 on the boundary condition subdataset and the triangular tessellation subdataset respectively. Across six of the eight evaluated subdatasets, MAE remains below 0.05 on the normalized [0,1] pixel scale. Encoder attention analysis via Grad-CAM and Grad-CAM++ confirms that the model develops physically meaningful internal representations, localizing attention at mechanically critical regions including phase boundaries, ligament junctions, and indenter contact zones without explicit structural supervision. Performance degrades on irregular square-grid geometries with sparse soft-phase inclusions, with the S11 normal stress subdataset yielding R2=0.7735 and SSIM=0.7126, consistent with the known limitation of smooth-loss image translation models in reproducing sharp stress discontinuities.
Lukas Maurer, Sascha Eisenträger, Marian Bulla +1math.NA cs.LG
Data-driven material modeling techniques have gained significant attention due to their ability to capture complex constitutive behaviors beyond the limitations of classical material models. Physics-augmented neural networks (PANNs), which embed physical constraints directly into their architecture, combine the flexibility of machine learning with the reliability required for engineering simulations. This work presents an approach to integrate such network architectures into the explicit finite element solvers Simcenter Radioss and OpenRadioss (Siemens). A framework for transferring pretrained network architectures and their parameters to a standalone user material routine is developed. Networks are trained using PyTorch, though the procedure can be adapted to other frameworks such as TensorFlow, enabling the use of PANNs within existing finite element technology without requiring specialized solvers. Particular emphasis is placed on computational efficiency. The influence of network architecture on simulation performance is investigated, and strategies for reducing evaluation costs while preserving accuracy are discussed. Specifically, replacing the SoftPlus activation function with SQuarePlus is shown to reduce computational cost. A publicly available GitHub repository automates the generation of Fortran user material routines, requiring only the specification of the network architecture and trained parameters. An example impact simulation demonstrates that the generated PANN user material reproduces the nonlinear behavior characteristic of hyperelastic materials under large strains, providing a practical route toward machine-learning-based constitutive models in explicit finite element simulations.
Scientific machine learning (SciML) has emerged as a promising approach for accelerating simulations of complex physical systems, yet achieving physically consistent and generalizable predictions for nonlinear, history-dependent problems remains a central challenge. In this study, we propose a hybrid GNN--FEM framework for efficient and generalizable phase-field fracture modeling. While phase-field approaches provide a robust variational framework for simulating complex crack evolution, their high computational cost limits practical applications because they require solving coupled, nonlinear, and history-dependent systems within an incremental finite element procedure. To address this challenge, a graph neural network surrogate is integrated into the conventional staggered scheme, replacing the phase-field update at each load increment while retaining the FEM-based displacement solver to enforce mechanical equilibrium and boundary conditions. By preserving the incremental solution structure, the framework remains consistent with history-dependent fracture evolution without requiring the surrogate to approximate the full solution trajectory. This selective surrogate strategy emphasizes the identification of a physically meaningful and incrementally structured learning target, rather than relying on brute-force data generation to learn the full fracture process. The proposed framework achieves strong generalization across varying geometries, loading conditions, material properties, and discretizations through dimensionless feature design, a graph-based formulation on mesh-based domains, and a physics-informed loss derived from the governing phase-field equation. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the hybrid approach reduces computational cost while maintaining accuracy compared with conventional FEM, and exhibits robust predictive performance across diverse problem settings.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are meshless and carry moving geometry and topology change through resampling of collocation points; the finite-element method (FEM) is the workhorse for boundary-fitted discretisations. Coupling the two across a shared interface promises the best of both, yet existing PINN-FEM schemes are validated only empirically. We put the coupling on a domain-decomposition footing: viewing each solver as a Steklov-Poincaré (trace-to-flux) operator, we transfer the classical Dirichlet-Neumann (DN) divergence diagnosis and its Robin-Neumann (RN) cure, including a closed-form, sweep-free interface impedance, and prove a PINN-specific contraction theorem: a trained network realises only a perturbed Steklov operator with a per-step training residual, and RN still contracts, with no shared-eigenbasis hypothesis, to a floor set by the achieved training loss. Because a PINN has no stiffness matrix, we introduce a Fourier-mode interface probe that recovers the network's resolvable Steklov eigenvalues to within 0.5% and doubles as a diagnostic of the network's spectral cap. The theory predicts measured PINN-FEM contraction rates to within 7% on 1D and 2D Poisson couplings, and a two-slab analogue of the large-added-mass regime shows RN's per-mode impedance matching winning decisively where tuned scalar relaxation saturates. We demonstrate the framework on a Stokes/rigid-disc problem with Alart-Curnier contact: the meshless PINN fluid absorbs the topology change at contact by collocation exclusion alone, no remeshing and no cut cells, and the static-equilibrium contact reaction matches the submerged weight to 0.4% under mesh refinement. We quantify remaining limitations: the warm-started PINN drifts off the Stokes manifold over long horizons, and matched FEM-FEM benchmarks attribute pre-impact squeeze-film signatures to PINN under-resolution.