Pouya Afshin, Tianling Niu, Tongtong Lu +6cs.CV cs.AI cs.LG
High-resolution images of unprocessed surgical breast tissue can be obtained using microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation (MUSE). This technique is considered a promising method for checking surgical margins during breast cancer surgery. In this study, MUSE images at 4x and 10x magnifications were compared using patch-level classification methods. Texture analysis (TA) based on local binary patterns (LBP) and deep learning (DL) with a base Vision Transformer (ViT) model were used. Both methods achieved similar performance at both magnifications. Using DL method, both 4x and 10x magnifications achieved 96.30% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 98.18% accuracy. Using TA method, 4x achieved better specificity (100% vs 93.33%) and 10x yielded higher sensitivity (100% vs 93.33%), but both had the same accuracy (96.67%). No clear improvement in performance was observed with 10x magnification. These results show that 4x imaging achieves the same diagnostic accuracy as 10x imaging. At the same time, 4x offers a larger field of view and faster image capture. Therefore, lower magnification can be effectively used in MUSE systems for accurate and efficient intraoperative margin assessment.
Raphael Reme, Victor Piriou, Alison Hanson +5eess.IV cs.CV
In time-lapse fluorescence imaging, single-particle-tracking is a powerful tool to monitor the dynamics of objects of interest, and extract information about biological processes. However, tracked particles can be subject to occlusion and intermittent detectability. When these phenomena persist over a few frames, tracking algorithms tend to produce multiple tracklets for the same particle. In this work, we introduce self-supervised learning of visual features to compare tracked particles, and we exploit both visual and positional distances to robustly stitch tracklets representing the same particle. We demonstrate the performance of our stitching framework on time-lapse fluorescence sequences of Hydra vulgaris neurons. Results show high stitching precision, and reduction of errors made by previous algorithms on the same data by a factor of two.