Human visual search is serial: the fovea must land on a candidate to confirm it, and those landings form a scanpath. Whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs), given the same foveated input, search as humans do bears on their use as models of human vision and on attention-alignment scores. We compare three general-purpose MLLMs with human eye-movement scanpaths on goal-directed search (COCO-Search18), driving each model fixation by fixation through an identical, human-matched foveated view and assessing it along three axes: the decision of target presence, the efficiency of reaching the target, and the gaze process itself. The axes dissociate. On the decision and on target acquisition the models match or exceed humans, detecting present targets near ceiling and reaching them on the first saccade more often than people do. The gaze process is not human. Under the human-matched condition, all three share one signature: low-entropy, large-amplitude, self-consistent scanpaths that agree with themselves far more closely than two humans agree with each other. That is consistent with a single-pass, non-serial architecture rather than a limit of acuity. Matched retinal input reproduces where humans look but not how the looking unfolds in time, and no degradation regime recovers human-like search at human-like success. The gap sits on a process axis that answer-alignment and saliency metrics do not measure. Because they miss it, such metrics cannot certify human-like vision, and zero-shot models suit outcome and spatial questions but not temporal, process-level ones.
Ibrahim Batuhan Akkaya, Kishaan Jeeveswaran, Bahram Zonooz +1cs.CV cs.LG cs.NE
The human visual system (HVS) employs foveated sampling and eye movements to achieve efficient perception, conserving both metabolic energy and computational resources. Drawing inspiration from this robustness and adaptability, we introduce the Foveated Dynamic Transformer (FDT), a foveation-guided dynamic token-selection architecture that integrates these mechanisms into a vision transformer framework. The FDT exhibits strong resilience to various types of noise and adversarial attacks, despite not being explicitly trained for such challenges. This inherent robustness is achieved through the use of fixation and foveation modules: the fixation module identifies fixation points to filter out irrelevant information, while the foveation module generates foveated embeddings with multi-scale information. At the 50% fixation-budget setting, FDT achieves higher accuracy than DeiT-S (81.9% vs. 80.9%) while reducing multiply-accumulate operations by 34.57%, highlighting one operating point on its accuracy-efficiency trade-off. These attributes position FDT as an HVS-inspired step toward artificial neural networks that combine adaptive computation with improved resilience.