Marina Gardella, Camilo Mari{ñ}o, Diego Belzarena +3cs.CV cs.LG eess.IV
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a key component in the digitization of historical archives. Recently, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as strong alternatives to traditional OCR systems, achieving state-of-the-art performance on standard benchmarks. However, their suitability for archival transcription remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we benchmark traditional OCR systems and VLM-based approaches on the Berrutti dataset, a challenging collection of Uruguayan dictatorship-era documents derived from microfilm scans. While VLMs consistently outperform traditional methods in terms of Character Error Rate (CER) and Word Error Rate (WER), we show that these improvements hide a more complex picture. Through a detailed qualitative analysis, we uncover systematic failure modes that are invisible to standard metrics, including orthographic normalization, spurious content generation, and semantic substitutions that preserve fluency while altering meaning. Errors affecting named entities are particularly critical, as they can introduce substantial semantic distortions with minimal impact on CER and WER. These findings reveal a critical gap between quantitative OCR performance and transcription fidelity in real-world archival settings, and highlight the need for evaluation frameworks that go beyond character-level accuracy to capture the semantic reliability of generated transcriptions.
Saif Ur Rehman Khan, Hasaan Maqsood, Sebastian Vollmer +2cs.CV
Automated radiology report generation (RRG) can ease radiologist workload, yet most existing systems produce a report in a single forward pass, with no mechanism to check a claim against the image or revisit a finding once stated. We present CogRad, a cognitively inspired multi-agent framework that structures generation around four stages of a radiologist's reading process. A Scout agent discovers anatomical regions directly from image patches via slot attention and assigns region and disease-level triage scores; an Investigator agent concentrates representational capacity on the regions Scout flags as suspicious; a Writer agent compiles these signals into a disease gated visual prefix for a large language model; and a Verifier agent supervises training with a visual entailment loss and, at inference, re-examines its own draft sentence by sentence, regenerating any report it judges insufficiently grounded. On CheXpert Plus, CogRad attains a BLEU-4 of 0.316 and a CIDEr of 0.322, the best scores among the methods we compare against. On IU X-Ray, it attains a BLEU-4 of 0.201 and a CIDEr of 0.724, leading every baseline on every standard NLG metric. We further evaluate CogRad with RadGraph F1, CheXbert F1, and a hallucination analysis to assess clinical accuracy beyond standard text-overlap metrics, complemented by ablation studies and Grad-CAM-based visualizations that characterize each agent's contribution and the model's visual grounding.
Niyoj Oli, Sachin Acharya, Sandesh Pokhrel +7cs.CV cs.AI
Gastrointestinal cancers represent a growing health burden in the South Asian region, driven largely by rapid changes in socio-economic conditions and lifestyle habits. However, early diagnosis remains limited by inadequate equipment, financial resources, and scarce GI expertise. AI-assisted diagnosis and report generation show great promise in alleviating this problem by providing non-specialist healthcare workers the technical expertise to perform diagnosis. Yet, almost all open-source, publicly available datasets are predominantly collected from the European region, with minimal representation from the South Asian region. The lack of open-source GI datasets from diverse geographic regions has made it difficult to assess whether population bias is present in existing models, and to develop geographically inclusive AI tools for automated GI diagnosis. To address this gap, we introduce SAGE: An Expert-Annotated South Asian GI Endoscopy dataset for Multimodal Learning and Hallucination Analysis, for image captioning, multi-label classification, and VQA tasks. It consists of 1,300 images, their captions along with hallucination tag, 18 labels and 14,276 question-answer pairs making it well-suited for diverse range of tasks including classification, benchmarking, and fine-tuning LMMs. We further conducted benchmarking of task-specific models, like multi-class classifiers on the effect of population shift which reveals that such models suffers the most with an average F1 score drop of 54 points on South Asian dataset. Further, benchmarking of contemporary LMMs reveals a substantial drop in the average GREEN score for anatomical landmark detection (0.308) and abnormality detection (0.410). We open-source our dataset under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, and we hope to encourage others to contribute toward more inclusive dataset representation and help counteract population bias in medical AI.