Comparing Classical and Quantum Machine Learning for Regression in High Energy Physics Collision Data

The classification and regression of particle collision events constitute a persistent computational challenge in experimental high energy physics, where large volumes of simulated data must be processed with both speed and precision. This work carries out a systematic comparison of four classical machine learning architectures, support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks against their quantum counterparts: quantum SVM (QSVM), quantum neural networks (QNN), quantum CNN (QCNN), and quantum LSTM (QLSTM). All models are trained on simulated proton-proton collision events with electron-positron and muon-antimuon final states from the CERN Open Data portal, using transverse-momentum components as input features and transverse-momentum magnitude as the regression target. Classical architectures, and in particular the CNN and LSTM, achieve marginally better quantitative performance under current hardware and dataset constraints. Quantum models, however, reach competitive accuracy with substantially fewer trainable parameters: the QCNN reproduces the performance of the deep classical CNN using only four qubits and a circuit of depth three, pointing to a genuine parameter-efficiency advantage on near-term quantum devices. A baseline analysis confirms that the regression problem is non-trivial for shallow polynomial fits, supporting the relevance of the architectural comparison. These results characterize the trade-offs between classical and quantum approaches under realistic, resource-constrained conditions and provide a benchmark for future studies on actual quantum hardware.

Classical Hardware Acceleration of Quantum Autoencoders for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Collider Experiments

Quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms in high energy physics (HEP) can efficiently represent and leverage long-range, high-order correlations in high-dimensional collider data, potentially with fewer parameters and favorable scaling relative to classical models. Deployment of QML in real-time collider applications such as trigger systems requires the ability to emulate and compile quantum circuits classically, then synthesize the resulting quantum gates onto low-latency hardware accelerators, namely field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). We present a study of variational quantum autoencoder models for real-time anomaly detection triggers in modern collider experiments. The models achieve performance comparable to state-of-the-art classical approaches and, after FPGA synthesis, satisfy resource usage and timing constraints consistent with trigger applications in future colliders. This work provides one of the first FPGA implementations of QML models for HEP triggers, enabling higher-capability models in today's classical data acquisition pipelines while advancing quantum readiness of collider experiment infrastructure.

Physically Consistent Parameter Inference: Transparent Machine Learning Emulation in High Energy Physics and Cosmology

Global fits in high energy physics and cosmology often face the challenge of exploring high-dimensional parameter spaces with computationally expensive or topologically complex likelihood functions. In this work, we present a Machine Learning framework designed to emulate complex, often non-Gaussian likelihood landscapes using gradient-boosted regression trees (XGBoost). We discuss the advantages of the Machine Learning approach in terms of computational efficiency and the resolution of confidence regions, particularly in scenarios with complex correlations or "curved" degeneracies. We validate this methodology by applying it to a recent analysis on flavour anomalies in semileptonic $B$ meson decays and discussing the adaptability of this framework to other phenomenological systems, such as axion-like particles or cosmology global fits. Finally, we utilise SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) values to provide a transparent analysis of feature importance, ensuring that the Machine Learning predictions remain physically interpretable and consistent with the underlying physics.

Factorizable Normalizing Flows for parameter-dependent density morphing

Normalizing Flows excel at modeling a single fixed density, yet many problems across the sciences, such as high energy physics, instead require modeling how that density deforms as a function of continuous parameters: the strength of a physical effect, a calibration constant, or a source of systematic uncertainty. Learning a separate flow for every parameter configuration quickly becomes intractable, since the number of joint settings grows exponentially with the number of parameters. We introduce Factorizable Normalizing Flows (FNFs), which represent the parameter-dependent density as a fixed, high-fidelity flow for a reference configuration composed with a learnable transformation that is polynomial in the parameters and factorized over them. This structure has a practical consequence: each parameter's effect is learned in isolation, from samples in which that parameter alone is varied. The combined response of many parameters is then recovered by summation at inference, without ever sampling their combinatorially large joint space. On a controlled problem with two interpretable deformations applied jointly to the data, the learned transformation reproduces the true deformations and matches the optimal likelihood, while optional interaction terms capture residual correlations when several parameters vary strongly at once. The resulting model is interpretable, scales linearly with the number of parameters, and keeps the likelihood tractable. This provides a general tool for any inference workflow requiring continuous density morphing, and directly enables the next generation of unbinned likelihood fits in high energy physics.

Pre-Training for Simulation-Based Science: A Study on Jet Foundation Model Training Objectives

Foundation models (FMs) trained on large datasets and fine-tuned on downstream tasks have emerged as a powerful paradigm in AI for science. Industrial FMs are typically trained using self-supervision with masking due to the lack of labels. In many scientific domains, accurate simulations are plentiful and facilitate large, labeled datasets. This opens up new possibilities for pre-training. We present a systematic comparison of pre-training methods using the OmniLearned High Energy Physics FM framework. We test supervised classification, flow-matching generation, and self-supervised masked particle modeling. All models are pre-trained on the JetClass dataset and fine-tuned on two representative downstream tasks, top jet classification and JetNet conditional generation. Among other observations, for classification tasks, we find that pure classifier pre-training is optimal when downstream labels and model capacity are plentiful, but combining it with self-supervised masked particle modeling (MPM) is uniquely powerful in the low-finetuning label regime. Flow matching-based generative pre-training seems to provide little benefit for downstream classification, and interestingly, for downstream generation, we find that flow matching must be in the pre-training objective to see a significant finetuning advantage, hinting at the orthogonality of classification and generation tasks. That is, for a model to transfer to both generative and classification downstream tasks, it must be pre-trained on both. This study provides a template for controlled scaling analysis of pre-training objectives for foundation models in simulation-based sciences.