Mohammad Albinhassan, Yuming Feng, Alessandra Russo +1cs.RO cs.AI cs.CL
Language and vision-language models generate plausible embodied plans but do not guarantee executability, as their outputs can violate environment dynamics or act on incorrectly grounded entities. We present a neurosymbolic agent that factors long-horizon household tasks into task-directed visual exploration and constrained symbolic planning. In the first phase, a vision-language model and exploration harness acquire goal-relevant predicates and instance bindings from egocentric observations and grounded interactions, producing a symbolic initial state. In the second, a PDDL transition model restricts decoding to tokens that extend applicable actions. Monte Carlo tree search then evaluates executable continuations using a domain-independent planning heuristic. The resulting plans are executable by construction under the transition model, with transfer to the environment conditioned on correct visual grounding. On VirtualHome and ALFWorld, open 4B-27B models exceed 90% success in both environments, and our smallest agent substantially outperforms a 27B direct visual policy in each. Constraints and search prove complementary rather than interchangeable: in ALFWorld either alone solves under a third of tasks, whereas their combination solves over 95%. The method also uses several times fewer generated tokens than extended thinking and far fewer model-visible images than direct interaction, and residual failures localize to state acquisition rather than plan generation without any specialized training.
Bingrui Sima, Lizhong Wang, Xiaoya Lu +2cs.LG cs.CV
While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have empowered embodied agents to execute complex household tasks, they struggle to proactively handle dynamically emerging hazards during closed-loop interactions. Existing safety approaches often rely on runtime guardrails to block unsafe actions or induce excessive caution, which severely stalls task progress instead of actively resolving the underlying risks. To break this safety-progress trade-off, we introduce the Self-Evolving Just-In-Time Memory framework, which reframes embodied safety from progress-stalling guardrails to proactive hazard mitigation. The framework consists of a Risk-Sufficient Topological Belief Graph (RSG) for persistent safety-relevant state tracking under partial observability, an Agency-Grounded Factual Memory for precise hazard anticipation, and an Experience Memory that injects procedural Meta-Skills to guide executable, progress-preserving mitigation. Furthermore, we propose an automated Test-Verify-Write loop, allowing agents to continually refine their mitigation Meta-Skills from execution traces at test time. Experiments on IS-Bench demonstrate that our framework substantially boosts the Safe-Success rate across multiple VLM backbones (e.g., +30.3% on Qwen3-VL-8B), enabling agents to proactively mitigate hazards without stalling task progress. Code is available at https://github.com/DyMessi/JIT-Memory.