SQuaT: Self-Supervised Knowledge Distillation via Student-Aware Quantized Teacher Features

Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) enables the deployment of quantized models with minimal accuracy degradation. However, in practical scenarios, training labels are often unavailable due to privacy, copyright, or cost constraints. Knowledge Distillation (KD) is a common approach to address this challenge, but we observe that prior work combining QAT with KD suffers from a fundamental limitation: during distillation, the range mismatch between the teacher and the quantized student model induces an unattainable residual, resulting in an irreducible lower bound on the distillation loss. Motivated by this observation, we propose SQuaT (Student-Aware Quantized Teacher Features), a label-free QAT framework with KD that theoretically eliminates this lower bound by applying the student's quantization parameters to quantize the teacher's features during distillation. Through comprehensive experiments across diverse settings, we demonstrate that SQuaT consistently outperforms strong baselines, with particularly pronounced gains in extreme low-bit (e.g., 1- and 2-bit) settings. Furthermore, extensive evaluations across various model design choices show that our approach does not rely on specific architectural assumptions, making it broadly applicable across diverse architectures and quantization settings. The source code is available at https://github.com/lcdbsa522/SQuaT.

Consensus as Privileged Context for Label-Free Self-Distillation

Sampling multiple solutions and returning the majority answer is among the most reliable ways to improve the reasoning accuracy of large language models without labels, and a growing family of methods converts this consensus signal into training supervision. However, existing approaches use consensus only in restricted forms: as a filter that selects solutions for fine-tuning, as a preference between answers, or as a scalar reward for reinforcement learning, discarding most of the information that the agreeing solutions contain. We present CANON (Consensus-ANchored self-distillatiON), a label-free training method that turns consensus into dense, token-level supervision. For each unlabeled prompt, CANON samples multiple solutions, extracts the majority answer, and conditions a frozen snapshot of the model on a solution that reaches it; this consensus-anchored teacher then supervises the model on its own rollouts at every token. Experiments on mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks show that CANON improves pass@1 by up to 12 points, outperforming label-free reinforcement learning by 6 points at a seventh of its compute and approaching a teacher conditioned on gold solutions; trained on pooled unlabeled data, it transfers to held-out benchmarks, matching training methods that use gold labels. Analysis suggests that the improvements are not pure distribution sharpening: after training, the model solves problems it previously never solved in 32 attempts, and its majority vote itself becomes more accurate.

JURY-RL: Votes Propose, Proofs Dispose for Label-Free RLVR

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) enhances the reasoning of large language models (LLMs), but standard RLVR often depends on human-annotated answers or carefully curated reward specifications. In machine-checkable domains, label-free alternatives such as majority voting or LLM-as-a-judge remove annotation cost but can introduce false positives that destabilize training. We introduce JURY-RL, a label-free RLVR framework that decouples answer proposal from reward disposal: votes from model rollouts propose a candidate answer, and a formal verifier determines whether that candidate can receive positive reward. Concretely, only rollouts matching the plurality-voted answer are rewarded when that answer is successfully verified in Lean. When verification is inconclusive, we invoke ResZero (Residual-Zero), a fallback reward that discards the unverified plurality proposal and redistributes a zero-mean, variance-preserving signal over the residual answers. This design maintains a stable optimization gradient without reinforcing unverifiable consensus. Across three backbone models trained on mathematical data, JURY-RL consistently outperforms other label-free baselines on mathematical reasoning benchmarks and transfers competitively to code generation and general benchmarks. It attains pass@1 performance comparable to supervised ground-truth training, with superior generalization demonstrated by higher pass@k and response diversity.