A Remote Approach to Cashew Orchard Detection: Leveraging Active Learning with Satellite Imagery in Guinea-Bissau

Cashew production is a widespread economic activity in Guinea-Bissau, as well as other countries in West Africa. However, unregulated cashew production can be directly associated with increasing regionwide deforestation rates, biodiversity losses, and a fragile economic structure. There is no nationwide database for listing or georeferencing cashew orchards, so there is a clear need to remotely map their locations. In recent years, multiple methods for detecting orchards have been developed, though they have only been applied on a regional level. This work expands regional analyses to a nationwide scale. It develops a scalable and cost-effective remote approach, based on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, using Machine Learning techniques to detect cashew orchards automatically. Margin-based Active Learning techniques were employed to develop an optimal training set in terms of the number of points and their informativeness, leading to a cashew map with 94.0% balanced accuracy obtained entirely off-site. We created two datasets and a 2021 cashew map with 10m spatial resolution that are openly accessible through GitHub. The results demonstrate the possibility of a broader cashew orchard mapping, creating a new stepping stone for this environmental application.

Earth Embeddings

Earth observation is moving from foundation models that users must run themselves toward embedding products that package model feature outputs as reusable data without needing to download and process the imagery used to generate them. Earth embeddings are vectors that summarize locations, image patches, or pixels, letting users analyze compact features instead of repeatedly training or running large models on raw satellite imagery. This chapter explains the main types of Earth embeddings, from implicit location encoders to explicit patch and pixel products, and compares their coverage, resolution, dimensionality, storage cost, licenses, and reproducibility. We review their use in land cover and crop mapping, ecological and hazard modeling, socioeconomic prediction, and semantic search, with evidence on when embeddings improve on conventional features and when pooling, fusion, or spatial transfer limit performance. Two case studies show practical workflows for similarity search and land cover mapping. We close with guidance for choosing, evaluating, storing, compressing, and publishing embeddings, and with open problems in oceanic and atmospheric coverage, uncertainty, and benchmarking.

Is sub-metre resolution necessary for cocoa mapping? A landscape-stratified evaluation of very high resolution imagery, decametric Earth Observation inputs, and operational products in Cote d'Ivoire

Accurate cocoa mapping is increasingly important for deforestation monitoring, supply-chain transparency, and regulatory applications. Spatial aggregation in conventional medium-resolution Earth observation (EO) imagery may limit cocoa detection in heterogeneous smallholder landscapes. In Cote d'Ivoire, we therefore evaluated how mapping performance varies across landscape conditions, whether very high resolution (VHR) imagery provides a meaningful advantage, and whether foundation-model embeddings improve decametric cocoa mapping. We developed models using 0.5 m Pleiades VHR imagery, a 10 m Sentinel-2 annual composite, and embeddings from TESSERA and AlphaEarth Foundations (AEF), and additionally assessed four publicly available cocoa mapping products. Performance was evaluated through a landscape-stratified accuracy assessment using 2,821 independently interpreted reference points distributed across gradients of tree cover density and landscape fragmentation. The VHR model achieved the highest performance (F1 = 0.92) and maintained F1-scores above 0.90 across all strata. Among the decametric inputs, TESSERA performed best (F1 = 0.86), followed by AEF (F1 = 0.82) and Sentinel-2 (F1 = 0.76). Of the existing cocoa products, the Kalischek product performed best (F1 = 0.83), comparable to the internally trained AEF model. Performance differences between VHR and decametric approaches increased with fragmentation and under low and high tree cover density conditions. Targeted VHR acquisition may therefore be particularly beneficial in complex cocoa landscapes, while foundation-model embeddings offer a scalable alternative for large-area mapping.