The Rise of Verbal Reinforcement Learning

Natural language is emerging as a primary feedback channel for improving language agents, capable of conveying intent, preferences, and causal structure in forms interpretable by both humans and modern language models. We call this paradigm Verbal Reinforcement Learning (VRL) and offer the first unified account of it. We organize the field around a single axis, \textit{when} verbal feedback takes effect in an agent's lifecycle and \textit{what} it modifies, yielding three pillars: (1) \textbf{Language as Grounding Signal}, where language defines the task itself by specifying goals, states, and reward structures; (2) \textbf{Language as Deliberative Feedback}, where natural language guides reasoning at test time without the need to update model parameters; (3) \textbf{Language as Learning Signal}, where language-based feedback shapes model parameters through training. Within each pillar, we synthesize representative work, distinguish key subcategories of approaches, and outline the distinct role language plays in shaping agent behavior. Together, this taxonomy shows how verbal reinforcement is reshaping agent development, while also defining the challenges and opportunities for building more capable and aligned agents.

Training-Free Action Correction for VLA Model Failures via Language Feedback

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate strong semantic understanding yet exhibit systematic failures during deployment. The conditions under which these failures occur, and whether they can be corrected without retraining, remain poorly understood. In this paper, we take steps toward addressing this gap. We present CorrectVLA, a framework that translates task-level natural language corrections into additive action magnitude adjustments without modifying policy weights. A human provides a single task-level correction, applied uniformly across all rollouts without per-episode intervention. In simulation, CorrectVLA recovers execution misalignment failures across both in-distribution and OOD tasks. In real-robot experiments on a UFactory xArm7 under environment shift, CorrectVLA restores near-perfect success where the base policy almost entirely breaks down, generalizing across object locations and identities. Through a taxonomy of failure modes on LIBERO-90, we find that execution misalignment failures, where the policy reaches the correct target but miscalibrates action magnitudes, represent the correctable subset, while other failure modes where semantic comprehension itself breaks down are not amenable to this approach. The approach succeeds when policies possess strategic correctness and fails when fundamental comprehension is absent, establishing a practical operational boundary for inference-time correction.

AIDE: Automated Instruction via Distilled Expertise for Reference-Free Motor Skill Coaching

Generating natural-language coaching feedback on motor skills can accelerate learning, yet expert coaches are scarce and expensive. Existing reference-based methods require expert demonstrations at both training and inference time, limiting practical deployment. We propose AIDE (Automated Instruction via Distilled Expertise), a framework that exploits expert references only during training and generates feedback from a learner's pose sequence alone at inference. A teacher model first learns to generate feedback from paired learner-expert poses via a frozen language model, producing separate learner tokens and difference tokens that encode the learner-expert difference. A student model then inherits the teacher's encoder and weight initialization, replacing the explicit expert comparison with an auxiliary module that produces complementary tokens from the learner's pose alone. On the ExpertAF dataset, AIDE outperforms reference-free baselines on most metrics and performs comparably to methods requiring expert demonstrations at both training and inference, with LLM-based evaluation supporting these findings.

Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control, but the mapping from language to behavior is often brittle and unintuitive: semantically similar instructions can induce drastically different behaviors, while some capabilities may not be elicitable through prompting alone. As a result, both human instructions and zero-shot language models can fail to reliably steer VLAs toward successful task execution. In this work, we propose a framework that interactively searches for language sequences that improve closed-loop VLA task performance, distills these sequences into a test-time language feedback policy (LFP), and learns an improvement head that predicts when language steering will improve performance. We conformalize this improvement head to prevent harmful steering interventions, where the LFP decreases task performance relative to the original instruction on out-of-distribution scenarios. Crucially, our approach operates on arbitrary frozen pre-trained VLAs, requiring neither access to the original training distribution nor fine-tuning of the underlying model. On seen environments, our conformalized LFP improves base VLA performance by 24.7% in simulation and 65.0% in hardware. On visual and semantic perturbations, our conformalized LFP has strong harmlessness guarantees, and produces recovery behaviors not observed with open-loop prompting.