Learning to Rank Tensor Network Contraction Plans for GPU-Accelerated Quantum Circuit Simulation

Classical simulation remains essential for developing and validating quantum algorithms, but its cost grows rapidly with circuit size. Tensor-network contraction can reduce this cost by exploiting circuit structure, although its efficiency depends strongly on the chosen contraction plan. On GPUs, plans with similar theoretical complexity may perform very differently because execution also depends on parallelism, reduction structure, memory traffic, and contraction geometry. We present a learning-to-rank framework for selecting efficient contraction plans before executing them. Each plan is represented by structural features derived directly from its sequence of pairwise contractions, and gradient-boosted rankers are trained from GPU measurements using listwise and pairwise objectives. We evaluate the resulting models on diverse circuit families, using separate in-distribution and circuit-family-shift test sets, and compare them with random and MinFill-based baselines. The learned rankers generally identify better plans, with the listwise model providing the strongest overall decision quality. We also study backend shift by comparing empirical plan orderings on two GPU architectures and evaluating the source-trained models on the second device without retraining. The rankings remain substantially, though not perfectly, stable across GPUs, and the models retain useful decision quality. These results support Learning to Rank as a practical way to reduce contraction-plan search, while showing that performance remains partly backend dependent.

Structure-aware Relative Policy Optimization for Ranking

Ranking is a fundamental component of modern information access systems. Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a flexible framework for directly optimizing coarse-grained feedback and system-level objectives defined over the complete ranking list. However, existing RL-based ranking methods typically treat each sampled permutation as an atomic output and evaluate it primarily through a scalar reward, overlooking the structural relationships among different ranking lists. Consequently, permutations with similar rewards but substantially different permutation patterns may receive comparable optimization signals, potentially leading to inaccurate credit assignment and overly aggressive policy updates. To address this limitation, we propose SRPO, a \textbf{S}tructure-aware \textbf{R}elative \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{O}ptimization framework for listwise ranking. SRPO measures the discrepancy between sampled permutations using a top-weighted Kendall-tau distance and normalizes their pairwise reward differences by the corresponding distances. It quantifies the reward improvement per unit of ranking change, thereby emphasizing efficient local refinements, particularly those involving top-ranked positions. Experimental results across two ranking scenarios demonstrate that explicitly modeling permutation-level differences improves the effectiveness and stability of listwise ranking, with particularly favorable performance in limited-feedback and complex list-level optimization settings.