Learning-Augmented and Randomized Algorithms for Line Aggregation with Delays

This paper studies learning-augmented and randomized online aggregation with delays on a line metric. We consider advice given as online suggested service lengths, and evaluate the algorithms in terms of robustness and consistency. For each $λ\in (0,1]$, we first propose a deterministic learning-augmented \textsc{Balance} algorithm that is $(4/λ+1/λ^2)$-robust and $(4+λ)$-consistent. We also propose a randomized algorithm for the problem in the classical adversarial model, which is $(e+1)$-competitive against an oblivious adversary, improving over the deterministic $5$-competitive \textsc{Balance} benchmark~\cite{bienkowski2013chain}. Notably, this competitive ratio is even lower than the lower bound of $4$ for deterministic online algorithms. Moreover, we establish a lower bound of $e$ on the competitive ratio of randomized online algorithms, improving the previous lower bound of $e/(e-1)$. Besides, we combine the two ideas and obtain a randomized learning-augmented algorithm that is $(e/λ+1/λ^2)$-robust and $(e+λ)$-consistent. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to complement our theoretical analysis and evaluate the empirical performance of our algorithms.

CASP: Learning-Augmented Offline Approximation with Verifiable Certificates and Bounded-Loss PAC Guarantees

Machine-learned predictions can speed up offline NP-hard optimization, but asking a predictor what to do amounts to asking it to solve the problem, and committing an unchecked prediction forfeits every worst-case guarantee. CASP (Certificate-Augmented Solution Pruning) instead asks which parts of the search space may be ignored, and accepts each answer only after a sound polynomial-time verifier has checked it, so correctness never depends on prediction quality. We develop the learning theory of this design. The verifier makes the induced loss class uniformly bounded, so certificate parameters are learnable from $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log K)$ samples ($K$ the maximum instance size), whereas the unverified commitment class admits no distribution-free rate and, under cost spread $R$, none below $Ω(R/\varepsilon^2)$. Filtering noisy predictions by verifiable confidence dominates the standard min-combiner, with a margin we compute in closed form, and the prediction stays useful even given the LP, because it breaks ties on degenerate optimal faces, where every symmetric LP policy, meaning one whose commitments depend on the instance only through the verifiable confidence values, provably stalls. Experiments on five problems test the theory's quantitative predictions. With trained predictors, unverified pruning loses up to $26%$ of the optimum under distribution shift, while the verified deployment of the same predictions loses nothing.

Asymptotically Robust Learning-Augmented Algorithms for Preemptive FIFO Buffer Management

We present a learning-augmented online algorithm for the preemptive FIFO buffer management problem, where packets arrive online to a finite-capacity buffer, must be transmitted in FIFO order, and the algorithm may preemptively discard buffered packets to accommodate future arrivals. Our algorithm simultaneously achieves 1-consistency, η-smoothness, and asymptotic \sqrt{3}-robustness, where ηdenotes the prediction error. Specifically, it attains an optimal competitive ratio of 1 under perfect predictions, degrades smoothly as the prediction error increases, and maintains an asymptotic competitive ratio of \sqrt{3} under arbitrarily inaccurate predictions, matching the best-known worst-case guarantee for the classical online problem, established by Englert and Westermann in 2009 [Algorithmica 53(4): 523-548]. A key technical contribution of our work is the introduction of an \emph{output-based prediction error metric}. Because capacity constraints dictate that only a strictly bounded subset of arriving packets is ultimately transmitted, our metric assesses prediction quality over the resulting optimal schedules rather than the raw input sequences, avoiding artificial error penalties. To guarantee robustness, our algorithm dynamically monitors predictions and executes a \emph{buffer-clearing strategy} upon transitioning to a worst-case fallback mechanism. We prove that the competitive loss incurred by this clearing operation is bounded by an additive capacity constant that vanishes asymptotically. Finally, we show that our algorithm provides a generalized framework for learning-augmented buffer management: substituting the fallback module with any β-competitive online algorithm immediately yields asymptotic β-robustness.