Local and Global Regimes of Geometric Complexity in Language Model Representations

Intrinsic dimensionality (ID) is widely used to probe the representational complexity of language models, but it remains unclear whether ID differences reflect properties of language itself or artefacts of how the underlying dataset was constructed. In this paper, we focus specifically on how lexical diversity, the number of unique last-token items present in a dataset, affects ID estimates of that dataset. We find a scale-dependent transition between two regimes: at low lexical diversity, conditions with fewer unique final words produce higher ID, while at high lexical diversity, this ordering reverses, and conditions with more unique words produce higher ID. We derive an exact, parameter-free formula for the point at which this reversal occurs, which matches the observed transition point at every scale tested. On the one hand, our results highlight how care must be taken when interpreting the intrinsic dimensionality of a set of representations as a straightforward cue of their complexity. On the other hand, our discovery of the two ID regimes reveals a general principle of organisation of linguistic data in LLMs that sheds new light on their inner manifold structures.

Are You Sure You're Sure? On the Impact of Instruction Tuning on Confidence and Lexical Diversity

Instruction-tuned language models achieve strong performance across a range of generation tasks, but have also recently been shown to exhibit verbalized overconfidence. In question answering, verbalized model overconfidence may be associated with the consistency of the generated supporting rationales. In this paper, we study whether corresponding changes in the lexical diversity of generated answer rationales accompany changes in model confidence induced by instruction tuning. We evaluate three matched base and instruction-tuned models across question-answering benchmarks and find that instruction tuning consistently alters answer confidence, despite limited changes in predictive accuracy and decreases in likelihood-based calibration. Secondly, we observe a non-uniform effect of instruction tuning on rationale diversity: cross-rationale diversity consistently decreases, whereas surface-level lexical diversity varies in both direction and magnitude across models and benchmarks. Finally, we find that these differences persist after controlling for answer selection and rationale length, confirming that confidence and rationale diversity capture distinct effects of instruction tuning.