Safety as Polytope (SaP) learns linear half-space constraints in LLM hidden space but requires per-category tuning of the constraint count K. We show that sparse autoencoder (SAE) feature extraction resolves this: K=2 becomes optimal for 12/14 categories on Qwen3.5-9B, achieving 96-99% accuracy per category on our BeaverTails classification benchmark, largely eliminating the need for exhaustive sweeps (K=4-25 with random initialization). This convergence to two planes is consistent with the Linear Representation Hypothesis, providing suggestive evidence that safety boundaries in this setting admit a low-dimensional linear description in the SAE feature space. Building on this geometric perspective, we introduce a cone constraint whose learnable aperture adapts to each category's cluster concentration, stabilized by a three-phase training
Model dimension ($d_{model}$) is a fundamental hyperparameter in transformer language models, yet its role in setting the geometric limits of feature representation remains under-explored. Grounded in the Linear Representation and Superposition Hypotheses - which propose that models encode features as near-orthogonal directions in latent space - we develop a framework for estimating how many such directions a model can support. We first establish the embedding matrix as a measurable proxy for near-orthogonality constraints across the latent space: the boundary between meaningful token relationships and incidental similarity in the pairwise cosine similarity distribution gives a concrete estimate of the model's accepted deviation $\varepsilon$ from perfect orthogonality. Applying this metric across dozens of open-source models reveals two classes: models with high $\varepsilon$ whose embeddings lack near-orthogonal structure, and models with low $\varepsilon$ that maintain it. We then show that the standard Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma greatly underestimates the packing efficiency of trained representations, and derive an adjusted capacity formula in which the number of near-orthogonal directions depends on the ratio of vectors to dimensions ($k/d$) rather than the raw count - a single modification that cuts prediction error by two orders of magnitude with no extra parameters. Combining these results, we define representational capacity as an upper bound on the number of distinguishable directions available for features and embeddings in a model's latent space. Capacity is exponentially sensitive to $\varepsilon$, and larger models favor tighter orthogonality constraints over maximizing raw capacity - a pattern compatible with several explanations (a stability-capacity trade-off, a ceiling on usable concepts, or confounds with model scale) that we leave to future work.