Deep neural networks have shown impressive success in NLP tasks owing to their complex structure and huge number of edges. Achieving state-of-the-art performance in natural language processing with a large pre-trained model such as BERT is expensive and time-consuming, carries a large carbon footprint, and is difficult to realize on machines with minimal computational capability. This creates a barrier to training complex models for resource-constrained languages such as Bengali. However, in a complex neural model, not all edges are equally impactful, and the contributions of some of them can be neglected. Pruning promises to reduce the memory footprint of regular networks, shorten the training time of ever-growing networks, and increase inference efficiency without sacrificing comparable performance. In this work, we introduce BnBERT-iPET, a sparse few-shot language modeling approach for Bengali, and experimentally show that a lightweight few-shot-learned language model retaining only 10% of the edges of an initial model such as BERT can perform neck and neck with much larger models on challenging tasks for a resource-constrained language such as Bengali. By learning from few shots through iterative pattern exploiting training and achieving 90% sparsity with the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis pruning technique, our pruned BnBERT-iPET model proves to be a tough competitor to state-of-the-art language models such as Bangla Electra, Indic-BERT, and XLM-RoBERTa on downstream tasks over standard benchmark datasets of the Bengali language.
Bryce A. Christopherson, Jack Baretz, Darian Colgrove +1cs.LG math.OC
The lottery ticket hypothesis proposes that large random neural networks contain sparse subnetworks that can match the performance of dense models after comparable training. A stronger version asserts that sufficiently overparameterized random networks contain subnetworks that are already accurate before any weight training. Existing theory establishes that such strong lottery tickets exist, but reliable extraction remains difficult. We revisit edge-popup, a frozen-weight score-training method for extracting strong tickets, and identify layerwise sparsity selection as a central bottleneck. We introduce double-scoring, an augmented score-space parameterization that replaces a layerwise sparsity search with optimization over enlarged score tensors. We prove that fixed-density masking in an augmented score space preserves access to all original-coordinate masks, and we show that the resulting method can be interpreted as edge-popup on a zero-augmented network. In controlled experiments, double-scoring substantially improves strong-ticket extraction over fixed-density edge-popup and pruning-at-initialization baselines, improves on the performance of rewound sparse-training topologies, and exhibits markedly lower sensitivity to sparsity hyperparameters. Ablations show that the gain is not merely due to additional trainable score parameters, but is tied to the augmented score-space competition that induces the effective original sparsity.
Romana Qureshi, Hafida Benhidour, Said Kerrache +1cs.CV cs.LG
Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance. Although the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) shows that sparse subnetworks can match dense networks when trained from suitable initializations, its iterative pruning procedure requires multiple complete training cycles. This work evaluates progressive magnitude-based pruning as a single-cycle alternative. The method gradually increases sparsity during training using a linear schedule and updates pruning masks based on active weight magnitudes. We conduct systematic experiments on CIFAR-10 and MNIST across ResNet, VGG-style, and LeNet architectures, comparing the proposed method with representative iterative and initialization-based pruning baselines, including LTH, SNIP, and GraSP. On CIFAR-10, the method achieves 95.12\% accuracy on ResNet-18 at 72.9\% sparsity, compared with 90.5\% reported for LTH. At extreme sparsity, it achieves 93.13\% accuracy on a VGG-like architecture at 97\% sparsity, compared with approximately 92.0\% for SNIP, and 93.44\% accuracy on VGG-19 at 97.97\% sparsity, compared with 92.19\% for GraSP at 98\% sparsity. A sparsity-accuracy analysis on ResNet-18 further shows that accuracy remains within 0.1 percentage points of the dense baseline across 70--85\% sparsity. These results indicate that progressive magnitude-based pruning provides an effective single-cycle approach for neural network sparsification under the evaluated settings.