Prototype-guided transfer of sparse literature knowledge for electrolyte additive discovery

Electrolyte additive discovery remains challenging because experimentally validated molecules are sparse, whereas accessible chemical spaces are vast and largely unlabeled. This challenge is amplified in lithium-ion batteries, where additive performance arises from coupled interfacial reactions rather than a single molecular property. Here, we develop a prototype-guided molecular intelligence, ProtoMI, a literature-driven framework that learns transferable structural priors from reported electrolyte additives and uses them to prioritize candidates in unlabeled chemical space. For boron-containing additives, ProtoMI combines 126 literature-reported molecules with 179,977 unlabeled candidates. Graph contrastive learning identifies seven chemically interpretable prototypes from the reported additives, and prototype guided semi-supervised contrastive learning adapts these prototypes to the candidate space under source-target distribution mismatch. In retrospective temporal validation, ProtoMI achieves enrichment factors of 9.2-45.6 while screening less than 2% of the candidate space. A subsequent translation step identifies four commercially accessible candidates. One representative candidate, 4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-2-[10-(1naphthyl)anthracen-9-yl]-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (TNDB), improves high-temperature LiFePO4||graphite cycling at 55 °C by 34.93% relative to the baseline electrolyte. An arsenal of characterizations and operando optical fiber Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy suggest that TNDB forms B-containing, F/P/O-modified inorganic interphases, suppresses solvent decomposition and reduces Fe deposition on graphite. This case study shows how sparse literature knowledge can guide experimentally efficient molecular discovery in data-scarce battery-additive spaces.

CheMLFlow: An Open-Source Platform for Cheminformatics and Materials Informatics Applications

CheMLFlow is an open-source platform for building and executing end-to-end, high-throughput, and agentic workflows for scientific and technological applications. CheMLFlow targets a common bottleneck in scientific machine learning development, where researchers often need to assemble data acquisition, curation, representation, model training, validation, screening, interpretation, and reporting into a reproducible pipeline, even when their primary research contribution concerns only one stage. CheMLFlow provides modular workflow components, ready-to-run reference pipelines, standardized artifacts, and evaluation outputs that reduce orchestration overhead and support benchmarking across methods and datasets. The platform is designed to be extensible, reproducible, and automation friendly, with pluggable representations and models, deterministic splits, explicit run artifacts, batch execution, and report generation. As scientific software increasingly moves toward agent assisted experimentation, CheMLFlow's configuration driven workflows and structured outputs also provide a practical interface for coding agents to help users construct experiments, inspect results, and summarize findings under human supervision. This article describes the system architecture, core workflows, and benchmarks that reach literature performance for quantum mechanical, physicochemical and bioactivity property prediction, and use cases involving time series datasets demonstrating applications beyond molecular chemistry datasets.

When Literature Data Mislead Artificial Intelligence in Materials Discovery

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly treats scientific literature as a data source for building databases, training predictive models, and guiding discovery. Yet literature-derived datasets often assume that reported experimental values are internally consistent and directly reusable. Here, we analyze this assumption using solid electrolyte (SE) conductivity data as a representative materials-science case. By tracing values from source articles to curated datasets, we identify recurrent text-figure mismatches, ambiguous axis annotations, unit inconsistencies, and missing measurement context. These discrepancies are often numerically plausible and therefore difficult to detect through routine preprocessing, but they can propagate as structured label noise during database construction and machine-learning reuse. A cross-database example shows how ambiguous reporting can create a 100-fold conductivity error. Our analysis reframes data accuracy as an infrastructure requirement for artificial-intelligence-driven discovery and motivates traceable reporting, curation, and validation practices for reusable scientific data. Keywords: AI for science; Data reliability; Scientific databases; Structured label noise; Literature-derived data; Materials informatics; Solid electrolytes

From Materials Database to Materials Bank: Assetizing Data for AI Driven Materials Innovation

Driven by high-throughput experimentation, computational modeling, and artificial intelligence (AI), materials data has expanded at an unprecedented rate. Conventional materials databases function only as passive repositories, archiving raw experimental records indiscriminately including both successful and failed data, without systematic value filtering or asset management. This creates a critical gap between massive data accumulation and actionable innovation, hindering the identification of high-potential materials and industrial translation. To address this bottleneck, we propose an industrialization-oriented Materials Bank, a dedicated valuefiltering and assetization layer that operates beyond traditional databases. It does not merely curate high-quality data but systematically elevates qualified candidates into standardized, upgradable materials assets via a multi-dimensional BankCard framework covering scientific validity, synthesis feasibility, application readiness, and industrial value. By unifying databases, AI models, automated experimentation, and multi-criteria assessment into a cohesive closed-loop ecosystem, the Materials Bank establishes a clear trajectory from data to knowledge, candidate, asset, and product. It serves not as an enhanced database or screening tool, but as a decision infrastructure bridging academic discovery and industrial demand, offering a scalable paradigm to accelerate AI-driven materials innovation and deliver tangible real-world impact.

Building informative materials datasets beyond targeted objectives

Materials science data collection can be expensive, making the reuse and long-term utility of datasets critical important for future discovery campaigns. In practice, researchers prioritize a subset of properties due to research interests. However, ignoring a subset of outcomes in data collection campaigns potentially generate datasets poorly suited for future learning tasks. Here, we present a framework for dataset construction that maximizes informativeness for target properties of interest while preserving performance on untargeted ones. Our approach uses diversity-aware selection to ensure broad coverage of the materials space. In noisy experimental dataset construction, we find that without our diversity-aware framework, prediction performance on untargeted properties can degrade by up to 40% relative to random sampling, whereas applying our framework yields improvements of up to 10% . For targeted properties, performance can degrade with respect to random sampling by up to 12.5% without diversity, while our framework achieves gains of up to 25%. Incorporating diversity into dataset construction not only preserves informativeness for the targeted properties, but also improves materials coverage for potential future objectives. As a result, the constructed datasets remain broadly informative across considered and unconsidered outcomes, ensuring unbiased quality entries and mitigating cold-start limitations in subsequent modeling and discovery campaigns.