When Modality Gap Reduction Fails: Prediction-Level Hubness in CLIP

Reducing the modality gap between image and text representations in CLIP is widely expected to improve cross-modal alignment and downstream performance. However, a smaller average image-text gap does not necessarily lead to consistent accuracy gains. We analyze this mismatch from the perspective of the decision structure in zero-shot classification, i.e. selecting the most similar class-text prototype for an input image. Zero-shot accuracy depends not only on average image--text alignment, but also on class-wise decision margins. Using Linear correction as an analytically tractable case, we show that modality gap correction can alter the relative decision structure among classes and cause predictions to concentrate on a small subset of classes. We refer to this output-space failure mode as prediction-level hubness. Furthermore, experiments across multiple datasets show that accuracy degradation under gap correction is consistently associated with increased prediction concentration, both for Linear correction and for learning-based correction methods. This provides a systematic explanation of why modality gap reduction does not consistently improve CLIP zero-shot accuracy from the perspective of downstream decision structure. Our results suggest that gap correction should be evaluated not only by average alignment, but also by its impact on downstream prediction structure.

V-Mem: Modality-Routed Retrieval for Long-Term Multimodal Agentic Memory

Interaction between users and LLM agents is increasingly multimodal: conversations interleave text with images, and a later question may target either. Yet most agent memories are designed around text, and even the few that support multimodal conversations still fail on vision-related questions. We trace this failure to an assumption behind the similarity search they rely on: in the index space, a query lies close to the relevant evidence that answers it. In multimodal settings, two gaps break it. By the modality gap, a query lies closer to memory content of its own modality than to evidence in another, even in a trained joint embedding space. By the similarity-relevance gap, the content most similar to a query is often not the evidence that answers it, most acutely when a query carries both text and image and its evidence resembles neither part alone. We present V-Mem, a multimodal agentic memory system that routes retrieval by the modality of the query and that of the target evidence, both recognized from the query alone. To cross the modality gap, V-Mem organizes the conversation into rounds and returns the target-modality content from the same round as the match, without comparing across modalities. To close the similarity-relevance gap, it searches with an LLM-generated anchor that sits closer to the relevant evidence than the query does: a hypothetical caption for a text-only query seeking an image, and an enriched search anchor, the query text plus relevant keywords extracted from the query image, when the evidence is reachable only by combining the two. On Mem-Gallery, V-Mem reaches an LLM-judge score of 0.82 versus 0.56 for the second best, with the largest margin on questions carrying an image (0.87, no baseline above 0.47); on LoCoMo it scores 0.69 versus 0.58.

On the modality gap and the contrastive loss in multi-modal representation learning

We study the modality gap in CLIP-style dual-encoder contrastive learning, where image and text embeddings remain misaligned despite being trained in a shared space. We argue that the gap is induced by a failure of the InfoNCE formulation with independent encoders. We conduct a uni-modal experiment with two independent encoders and identical initialization conditions and find that InfoNCE actively generates a gap at low temperatures. We provide a theoretical analysis of this phenomenon and show that the modality gap is indeed a mode-failure of InfoNCE, but only at low temperatures. We propose a simple modification called xNCE, which uses intermodal as well as intra-modality negative contrastive pairs. xNCE matches retrieval performance on MS-COCO while consistently reducing the gap even at low temperatures. Notably, xNCE improves zero-shot classification over the InfoNCE baseline across all benchmarks, whereas high-temperature InfoNCE and regularized InfoNCE both fail to do so, demonstrating that xNCE reduces the modality gap without sacrificing the discriminative geometry needed for transfer.

Entity Binding Failures in Speech LLM Reasoning: Diagnosis and Chain-of-Thought Intervention

Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) underperform their text counterparts on complex reasoning. We reveal that this modality gap is not a uniform cognitive deficit. Evaluating three diverse SLLMs, we show speech-to-text (S2T) matches or exceeds text-to-text (T2T) on spatial, syntactic, and factual tasks. However, on logical tasks requiring entity tracking, S2T accuracy collapses to chance. We diagnose this localized degradation as an entity binding failure: continuous speech features cause models to lose precise entity-property associations during implicit reasoning. To resolve this, we propose Entity-Aware Chain-of-Thought (EA-CoT), forcing SLLMs to explicitly enumerate entities and bind them to claims before reasoning. Strikingly, EA-CoT bridges the gap, even when spoken names are misrecognized, yielding up to a 24.4% absolute accuracy improvement. Ablations confirm these gains stem entirely from explicit semantic binding, reframing the gap as a resolvable bottleneck.