Construction-Driven Injection: Linguistically-Grounded Edit-Based Code-Mixing Fingerprints for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are costly intellectual assets that remain exposed to unauthorized redistribution and commercial misuse. Injected fingerprints, i.e., trigger--target pairs embedded in model behavior, offer a practical, black-box-verifiable ownership signal, but existing methods decouple the two stages of the fingerprint life cycle: how a fingerprint is constructed and how it is injected. Existing fingerprinting frameworks suffer from two limitations. Natural-language fingerprints are prone to accidental activation, and garbled fingerprints are easily filtered by perplexity-based detection. Furthermore, decoupling construction from injection leaves the latter unaware of the trigger's linguistic structure, missing the opportunity for targeted optimization. We argue that fingerprint construction should drive injection, and present a unified fingerprinting framework that jointly optimizes both stages. First, LCF constructs code-mixing fingerprints by combining low-resource languages under a semantic-density substitution rule and grammar-biased mixing, yielding triggers whose perplexity sits far below garbled baselines while avoiding the accidental-activation failures of natural-language triggers. Second, LCFEdit injects each fingerprint with a null-space projection derived from high-resource multilingual representations that preserves knowledge, augmented by a cross-lingual alignment step that steers the weight update toward the fingerprint language's representation subspace. This construction-aware injection ensures that the update is linguistically informed and therefore more stable. Extensive evaluations on imperceptibility, detectability, and harmlessness demonstrate persistent ownership verification with negligible impact on utility.

T2S: A Rehearsal-Based Approach for Extraction-Resistant Model Watermarking

Model watermarking safeguards AI model intellectual property by embedding distinctive knowledge that induces unique behavioral signatures. The primary technical challenge lies in ensuring watermark robustness against various post-processing attacks on the watermarked model. Model extraction attacks emerge as the most severe threat, where adversaries exploit prediction outputs to train surrogate models that illegally replicate the original model's functionality. In this work, we propose a rehearsal-based watermark embedding framework to enhance the robustness of model watermarks against model extraction attacks. By simulating the extraction process, our method leverages the loss of a \textit{simulated stolen model} on a trigger set as a training signal to fine-tune the watermark knowledge within the target model. This fine-tuning step encourages the watermark to be embedded in a way that boosts transferability, thereby increasing its chances of persisting and remaining detectable in stolen models. Comprehensive experiments conducted under diverse settings demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves the robustness of model watermarks against both model extraction and subsequent watermark removal attacks.

Token Rankings are Unforgeable Language Model Signatures

Language model parameters are known to impose unique (to each model) geometric constraints on their logit outputs, which serves as a signature that identifies the model, but also leaks the model's final layer parameters when an API distributes logits. We investigate more restrictive APIs that expose token rankings (i.e., their ordering by probability, but not the probability values) and find that rankings also constitute a signature: every model has a unique set of feasible top-$k$ rankings for sufficiently large $k$. Furthermore, the ranking signature is the first known (polynomially) unforgeable signature, since finding a model with the same set of feasible rankings is NP-hard. On the security front, we find that token rankings are already sufficient to approximately steal the final layer of the model, similar to logits, though the approximation is too coarse to forge the signature, and can be effectively countered by restricting the API to top-$k$ tokens with sufficiently small $k$. Since the top-$k$ required to present the model signature is generally smaller than the $k$ required to prevent stealing, it is possible for an API to present an unforgeable signature without leaking model parameters.