Generalizable Multi-Agent Planning from Signal Temporal Logic Specifications via Diffusion

Multi-agent systems in the real-world (e.g., drone swarms, autonomous cars, warehouse robots) must satisfy rich, temporal tasks while avoiding collisions. Signal Temporal Logic (STL) elegantly encodes such objectives, but current STL planning methods face critical limitations. State-of-the-art optimization-based approaches can handle arbitrary STL specifications but struggle with scalability, becoming computationally impractical as the number of agents grows. Learning-based methods efficiently handle a large number of agents with rapid planning times but fare poorly when deployment-time objectives differ from those used during training, and do not support planning tasks that require different specifications to be ascribed to different agents (i.e., heterogeneity) or team-level specifications requiring coordination of multiple agents. This fundamental trade-off between generalizability and scalability presents a challenge for realizing multi-agent STL planning algorithms in practice. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a new diffusion method for multi-agent planning with STL specifications. Using a differentiable approximation of STL, we integrate the STL gradient in the denoising process, making our approach generalizable to novel formulas whose predicates are placed anywhere within the goal region covered during training, while achieving the same scalability as existing learning-based methods. Our method supports heterogeneous specifications, and by using diffusion models, naturally enhances plan diversity, thereby significantly reducing safety-related violations (e.g., collisions) among agents. A detailed evaluation study justifies the utility of STL-guided diffusion-based multi-agent planners for constructing generalizable, scalable, and diverse plans. Videos and code are available at https://www.jeappen.com/diff-ma-stl/ and https://github.com/jeappen/diff-ma-stl .

Collective Counterfactual Planning: Coordination, Consent, and Verification under Representational Constraints

Groups routinely complete projects that no single member can plan, execute, or verify alone. We propose a formal model of this phenomenon, Collective Counterfactual Planning (CCP), in which the binding limitation on each agent is neither capability, knowledge, nor observability, but representational geometry: each agent perceives the state, conceives moves, consents to actions, and certifies goal requirements only through a projection onto an agent-specific subspace of a common task space. Four gates jointly determine whether a team can reach a conjunctive goal and legitimately recognize that it has done so: the exogenous implementation coalitions required to perform each action, together with three representational gates -- conception, consent, and task-relative verification qualification. We define the Collective Counterfactual Solvability (CCS) problem, separating geometric feasibility, executable attainment, and validated completion. The results expose a positive-negative duality. Iterated cross-agent relay can unlock a solution that no one-shot pooling of individual plans contains, but any goal requirement depending essentially on the subspace dark to the entire team is unverifiable and therefore not validly completable, even when the trajectory accidentally attains it. Memoryless and audited consent further constrain different objects -- action directions versus cumulative trajectory states -- and neither dominates the other. A four-step exhaustive horizon-bounded solvability scheme is sound and complete under exact representation of the relay closure; restricted implementations remain sound on returned plans but need not be complete. The model gives one geometry for sequential mutual enabling, competent execution of steps whose purpose is invisible to the executor, forced sub-teaming at expertise boundaries, and completion that cannot be validly declared.

Partner Capability Estimation for Task-Agnostic Adaptation in Ad-Hoc Teamwork

Effective collaboration with novel and diverse partners is a crucial skill for autonomous agents. Most current ad-hoc teamwork (AHT) approaches assume that agents will collaborate on a single, fixed task and that the partner's capabilities, their ability to successfully execute the desired action, are already known. In reality, a partner's true capabilities are often hidden, and human collaborators may act sub-optimally on tasks with multiple valid strategies. To address these limitations, we extend ad-hoc teamwork into a multi-task setting by re-framing it as a problem of joint planning with decentralised execution under hidden partner capabilities. We introduce CE-CM (Capability Estimation via Contextual Models), an approximate Bayesian method that infers task-invariant capability vectors. By using simulation-based sampling, the agent estimates capabilities and induces a contextual Multi-agent Markov Decision Processes for planning. This approach requires no population pre-training and refines its beliefs online from just a few tasks. To account for human unpredictability, we propose CE-CM-Div, an extension that evaluates capability hypotheses against diverse planner rollouts rather than a single optimal trajectory. Simulated experiments demonstrate that CE-CM rapidly recovers hidden capabilities, reduces infeasible action assignments, and adapts to changes over time. Furthermore, in an offline human study of 225 trajectories from 15 participants, CE-CM-Div substantially improved capability estimates over the baseline CE-CM method. Our results suggest capability-based modelling is a promising interpretable, task-agnostic representation in the studied settings, demonstrating that accounting for behavioural diversity is essential for robust human-AI teaming.

Multi-Agent Planning with Spatio-Temporal and Topological Constraints using STL-GO

Multi-agent planning problems arise in a variety of engineering applications, such as multi-robot wildfire fighting and unmanned aerial inspection in factories. A particular challenge is the existence of spatio-temporal (i.e., when and/or where an agent should do what) and topological constraints (i.e., how agents should interact), as typically formalized via the notion of graphs. Over the last years, various frameworks have been proposed that can capture such constraints via spatio-temporal logics. We focus here on spatio-temporal logic with graph operators (STL-GO), a recent formalism that supports reasoning about multiple agents and their topologies, such as sensing, communication, and task topologies. In this paper, we consider the problem of planning multi-agent paths that satisfy constraints written in STL-GO. This problem is particularly challenging due to the need of encoding multiple, potentially time-varying graphs via the graph operators inherent to STL-GO. We present two encodings of this problem, one based on mixed-integer programming (MIP) and another based on satisfiability modulo theory (SMT), with soundness guarantees. We provide a unified interface for specifying agent constraints, their graph topologies, and the STL-GO specification, enabling seamless use of both methods and facilitating direct comparison between them. We evaluate both encodings on a multi-UAV search-and-rescue benchmark, ablating over team size and graph complexity, highlighting the expressiveness of the proposed encodings under dynamic multi- graph interactions.

RELIC: Revealed Principles for Learning Interpretable Composable Skills in Multi-Agent Planning

Multi-agent planning becomes substantially harder when agents must improve specialized decision-making skills while keeping their executable implementations private. This setting arises when independently developed agents expose heterogeneous interfaces, observations, and capabilities, yet must coordinate under a shared team objective. Existing approaches commonly rely on centralized optimization, shared policy access, or common skill representations, assumptions that limit knowledge reuse when function signatures differ. We introduce RELIC, a framework for learning interpretable and composable programmatic skills through revealed principles. Each agent improves its own executable skill locally, while useful decision logic and coordination patterns are distilled into compact textual principles. Rather than requiring direct program exchange, these abstractions can be re-instantiated under agent-specific interfaces and reused across incompatible implementation spaces. A shared principle memory accumulates transferable knowledge and promotes abstractions that repeatedly improve team-level performance. This separation allows discoveries made by one agent to guide others while preserving local executable implementations and decentralized execution. RELIC therefore supports strategic transfer across both heterogeneous-role and shared-role cooperative teams. Extensive experiments across routing, scheduling, combinatorial optimization, and distributed coordination settings demonstrate RELIC's effectiveness against independent and joint LLM-based search methods, together with consistent benefits across task structures and LLM backbones.

A Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Dimensional Reduced-Order Model Planning

Zero-dimensional reduced-order models (0D ROMs) are central to multi-dimensional design workflows for high-end complex equipment. However, the planning process currently relies on manual expertise, limiting topological exploration and prolonging iterations. Even traditional optimization methods such as Genetic Algorithms (GA) are typically confined to local parameter tuning. Although Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in exploring large sample spaces, and frameworks such as Chain of Thought (CoT) and Reason and Act (ReAct) improve reasoning reliability, while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) overcomes domain knowledge barriers, a single agent still falls short for the long-horizon and highly coupled nature of complex 0D ROM planning. This paper proposes the Zero-dimensional reduced-order model CO-Planning framework (Z-COPA), a multi-agent architecture featuring a Symbolic Action Graph Engine (SAGE) and a MILP-Guided Navigation (MGN) optimizer. Its core innovation is a dedicated graph representation method that accurately encodes the 0D flow network topology, converting the empirical planning process into a rigorous graph structure optimization problem. We validate the forward and inverse design capabilities and generalization performance of Z-COPA on two real aircraft engine secondary-air systems, two IEEE power-distribution reconfiguration benchmarks, and two water-distribution network benchmarks. The results show superior task completion quality, obtaining the best performance in both forward and reverse design of air systems. Z-COPA disrupts the traditional 0D model planning paradigm, providing a new technical approach for exploring broader topological space and achieving highly automated, globally optimal air system architectures.

Tensor-Coord: Algebraic Decomposition of Joint Plan Tensors for Conflict-Free Multi-Agent LLM Planning

Large language models (LLMs) remain limited in multi-agent planning because independently generated plans can create coordination failures such as spatial collisions, resource contention, and temporal deadlocks. We introduce Tensor-Coord, a multilinear algebra framework that represents the joint plan of N agents as a third-order tensor \(T \in R^{N \times H \times A}\) over agents, timesteps, and actions. Canonical Polyadic (CP) and Tucker decompositions are used to identify latent coordination structure. The minimal epsilon-approximate CP rank R* defines a computable coordination complexity measure, with \(CC(Pi)=(R*-N)/N\). We prove that R*=N is necessary and sufficient for plan independence. The residual \(E=T-T_{R*}\) defines a conflict score over agent pairs, timesteps, and actions, localizing failures without domain-specific rules. Tucker factors provide interpretable agent roles, temporal phases, and action clusters that are converted into natural language constraints for iterative LLM replanning. Experiments on multi-robot delivery tasks across Easy (2 agents, 5x5 grid), Medium (3 agents, 5x5 grid), and Hard (4 agents, 5x5 grid) settings show convergence to conflict-free plans in 100% of 2-agent cases within 1.4 iterations on average, 80% of 3-agent cases within 3.2 iterations, and 60% of 4-agent cases within 4.0 iterations. CP rank scaled approximately linearly as \(R*(N) = 3.9N + 0.5\), supporting its use as a predictor of coordination complexity.