Refurbishment-based noisy-label learning mixes an observed label with a model-derived pseudo target, typically using one sample-wise cleanliness score to control both branches. This creates a hidden coupling: reducing trust in the observed label automatically increases trust in the pseudo target. We show that this complementarity can replace one unreliable signal with another because a pseudo target learned from corrupted supervision may reproduce the noise it is meant to correct. Our representation diagnostics provide a consistent account of this mismatch: noisy supervision redirects deeper layers more strongly, whereas shallower relations remain comparatively stable and provide information beyond the loss posterior. We therefore propose TRACE, a Two-Source Reliability Assessment framework for Label Correction and Sample Reweighting. TRACE assesses the observed label using loss fit, shallow relation stability, and prediction agreement, while separately assessing the pseudo target using model confidence. Its source-specific scores control target correction and supervision strength without assuming complementary reliability. Across synthetic and real-world noisy benchmarks, TRACE improves representative refurbishment baselines and yields more reliable pseudo supervision.
Jun Zhuang, Mohammad Al Hasan, Yiyu Shi +1cs.CV cs.LG
Noisy-label learning in small-scale medical image classification is challenging and hinders the superiority of deep neural networks. Recent studies suggest that quantum neural networks (QNNs) have shown potential in limited-data regimes, yet their use for noisy-label learning remains under-explored. A key obstacle is QNNs' intrinsic "natural smoothness", which may regularize training but also obscure high-confidence samples needed for noise-transition estimation. We propose Supermartingale-based Label Transition (SLT), an anchor-free loss correction framework for robust QNN-based medical image classification under noisy labels. SLT models entropy reduction in predictive distributions as a supermartingale and uses its monotonic behavior to identify stable transition-matrix refinement steps. This enables dynamic transition updates while reducing noise-driven oscillations during QNN training. We further provide a convergence analysis showing that the proposed transition-refinement process reaches a steady state. Experiments on multiple public small-scale medical image datasets demonstrate that SLT consistently improves QNN-based classification and stably outperforms classic noise-label learning baselines under synthetic and real-world label noise.
Modern neural networks can fit corrupted training labels, making noisy-label learning a useful setting for studying memorization-driven overfitting. Most regularization methods modify the objective, architecture, or data distribution; here we instead study a geometric intervention on the optimizer update itself. We evaluate OrthoGrad, which removes the component of each weight gradient parallel to the current weight vector, in noisy-label image classification. On MNIST with small-data regimes, OrthoGrad improves test accuracy most clearly for CNNs while reducing corrupted-label fitting. Mechanism diagnostics based on weight norms and gradient-weight cosine similarity suggest that the projection has the strongest effect when the raw gradient contains a nontrivial radial component, and becomes weaker in larger-data regimes where gradients are already nearly orthogonal to weights. Additional CIFAR-10 ResNet-18 experiments show that the method can alter memorization trajectories but does not prevent eventual noisy-label memorization. These results support orthogonal update constraints as a useful diagnostic for studying learning dynamics, while showing that OrthoGrad is regime-dependent rather than universally regularizing.
Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit. We introduce CILN, a benchmark generation framework that creates IDN through controlled input corruptions. A diverse voter pool labels corrupted instances, producing benchmark datasets in which both the source and severity of ambiguity are explicit and controllable. Using CIFAR10, MNIST, and Adult, we construct 90 benchmark settings spanning multiple corruption families and severity levels. Our experiments show that the resulting benchmarks exhibit genuine instance-dependent noise, provide diverse confusion structures, and, on CIFAR-10, can produce label distributions that are closer to human uncertainty than an existing synthetic IDN benchmark. We further demonstrate that corruption-mediated IDN can expose failure modes of popular noisy-label learning methods, including Co-Teaching and DivideMix, that are not observed under comparable levels of rater-fallibility noise. These findings suggest that noise structure, not only noise rate, plays an important role in benchmark difficulty and algorithm behavior. By making ambiguity generation explicit and controllable, CILN provides a complementary benchmarking framework for studying noisy-label learning under diverse sources of instance difficulty.