Ontology alignment (OA) has evolved through several methodological paradigms, ranging from lexical and structural aligners to knowledge graph embedding (KGE) models and, more recently, Large Language Model (LLM)-based approaches. Although modern OA frameworks provide unified ecosystems for deploying these heterogeneous aligners, mechanisms for systematically reconciling their complementary and sometimes conflicting predictions remain relatively underexplored. We present OntoAligner-Ensemble, a modular and aligner-agnostic framework that combines candidate correspondences through a configurable two-stage process comprising voting-based fusion strategies followed by post-fusion selection policies. The framework supports any aligner implemented within OntoAligner that produces candidate correspondences, enabling diverse alignment paradigms to be integrated through a unified decision process. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we instantiate the framework using representative lightweight string-aligner, KGE-based, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation aligners powered by both open-weight and API-based LLMs. We evaluate individual aligners and ensemble configurations across eight benchmark tasks from five OAEI tracks spanning biomedical to beyond-equivalence. The results show that ensemble fusion consistently improves the balance between precision and recall and frequently outperforms standalone aligners across diverse domains. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that ensemble composition directly affects the precision-recall trade-off: heterogeneous cross-paradigm ensembles generally improve precision, whereas homogeneous LLM ensembles more often achieve higher overall F1-scores. These findings demonstrate that systematic ensemble learning offers a robust and reproducible strategy for OA while providing practical guidance for selecting ensemble compositions under different alignment scenarios.
We align three upper ontologies that sit under UK and NATO defence data infrastructure: the Information Exchange Standard (IES), the Higher Quality Data Model (HQDM) that underpins the National Digital Twin, and Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). No public alignment between IES and HQDM existed. Promoting a hand-curated 17-correspondence crosswalk to OWL and reasoning over the complete merged ontologies with HermiT produces three results that we believe matter beyond this pair.
Jonathon Dilworth, Pedro Giesteira Cotovio, David Herron +4cs.AI
The use of ontologies and knowledge graphs is becoming increasingly widespread in the defence and national security domain. Numerous ontologies have been developed through initiatives led by academia, industry, and government. Achieving interoperability across diverse defence and national security ontologies remains a major challenge due to the domain's breadth and specialisation. In this work, we analyse and document over 60 publicly available ontologies and introduce a new track for the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI). This track comprises eight matching tasks, consensus alignments and manually-curated (silver-standard) mappings. The consensus alignments are derived by aggregating the outputs of several state-of-the-art ontology alignment systems. The silver-standard is obtained from the manual validation of the consensus alignment together with a subset of the unique mappings (i.e., mappings suggested by only one system).
Jayant Ghadge, Soumyashree Kar, Surya S. Durbhacs.LG
High-throughput plant phenotyping generates valuable data that often remains trapped in unstructured text and isolated RGB images. To bridge this semantic gap, we propose a framework for constructing a multimodal granular Knowledge Graph (KG) to monitor genotype-phenotype interactions across time and experiments. In this work, we focus on wheat Triticum aestivum as a representative target crop to validate our methodology across complex canopy environments. Our pipeline first distills noisy field notes to extract entities and relations, dynamically constructing the KG by converting unique instances into hierarchical class entities via RDF-typing. These graph nodes are then aligned with standardized ontologies (PO, RO, WTO) using PlantDeBERTa. To visually ground the constructed graph, a Vision-Language Model paired with a wheat-segmentation ViT generates attention-based softmaps, linking specific KG entities directly to image pixels. We introduce a central observation node Plant_Obs_Id to connect these multimodal subgraphs temporally. Evaluated on 500 curated WisWheat samples using Pointing Game accuracy, Visual Word Sense Disambiguation (VWSD), and rank-based metrics, our neuro-symbolic approach successfully maps complex field observations to a structured graph. This enables automated field note auditing, temporal stress monitoring, and precise spatial trait localization for wheat breeders.