Parameterized Complexity of $L_p$-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and $L_p$-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes

Lipschitz constants are a standard way to quantify the sensitivity of neural networks to small input perturbations, but computing them is difficult even for shallow ReLU networks. We study this problem for two-layer input-convex neural networks (ICNNs), a restricted architecture where nonnegative output weights enforce convexity. Computing the $L_p$-Lipschitz constant for these networks is equivalent to maximizing the dual norm over a zonotope. While $L_1$- and $L_\infty$-norm maximization on zonotopes admit fixed-parameter and polynomial-time algorithms, respectively, the parameterized complexity of the remaining $L_p$-norms was open. We prove that, for every fixed $p\in (1,\infty)\cap \mathbb{Q}$, maximizing the $L_p$-norm over a zonotope in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is W[1]-hard with respect to the dimension $d$. Moreover, our hardness results imply that brute-force enumeration algorithms are essentially optimal for this problem under the Exponential Time Hypothesis. By duality, the same hardness results hold for computing the $L_p$-Lipschitz constant of two-layer ReLU ICNNs. Our proof first establishes the result for the $L_2$-norm and then transfers the construction to arbitrary fixed $p\in (1,\infty)\cap\mathbb{Q}$ using a suitable Taylor approximation. These results resolve the corresponding questions regarding the parameterized complexity status for zonotope norm maximization and two-layer ICNN Lipschitz constants. Our paper resolves an open problem posted at COLT'25. There are several independent concurrent papers resolving the same problem. Our paper prioritizes a clear exposition of the underlying mathematics and conceptual intuitions behind the proof. Additionally, we explicitly describe our research process including the use of LLMs.

Maximum Satisfiability of Simple Temporal Problems

The Simple Temporal Problem (STP) is a core framework for quantitative temporal constraints. As STP data can be inconsistent, we study MAXSTP: compute a maximum-cardinality consistent subset of constraints. This extension is NP-hard, and we analyze its parameterized complexity under measures that capture practically relevant instance features: the number of variables $n$ (instance scale), the maximum coefficient magnitude $k$ (numeric range), and structural parameters of the constraint graph such as treewidth $tw$ (decomposability) and vertex cover size $vc$ (density). We show that MAXSTP is W[1]-hard parameterized by $n$, implying that $n$ and parameters that depend on $n$ (including $tw$ and $vc$) are insufficient for fixed-parameter tractability. For combined parameters, we give an $O^*(k^n)$-time algorithm, yielding single-exponential solvability for fixed $k$. While $k+tw$ remains W[1]-hard, MAXSTP is in XP via an $O^*((n\cdot k)^{tw})$ algorithm. Our results suggest that MAXSTP is often computationally harder than optimizing qualitative CSPs. We verify that many such problems (including RCC-8 and Allen's algebra) are FPT when parameterized by $n$ or $tw$. However, we also demonstrate that FPT algorithms for MAXSTP are indeed possible but with other parameters such as $k + vc$.

Representative Sets in Propositional Abduction

The propositional abduction problem is a well-known form of non-monotonic reasoning where we are asked to find an explanation of a given manifestation. Recently, there has been an influx of results asking more refined questions about the solution space rather than only individual solutions. For example, we might be interested in finding two solutions that are sufficiently far from each other (diverse solutions) in the solution space. In this paper we consider a related representation question where we ask if a given set of explanations S can represent any other explanation (that is, whether their symmetric difference is smaller than a given k). We first study this problem from a classical complexity perspective and obtain a complete classification. While only a handful of cases are tractable, the increase in complexity compared to classical abduction is often smaller than expected. We then study the parameterized complexity for several parameters and obtain new tractable and hard cases. Interestingly, a full parameterized complexity classification would require resolving the parameterized complexity of the covering radius problem from coding theory. To the best of our knowledge, no useful relationship between coding theory and non-monotonic reasoning has previously been established, but such connections seemingly become important when asking more complex questions about solution spaces.