Whole-slide visual reasoning requires identifying sparse diagnostic evidence in gigapixel pathology slides and integrating observations across spatial scales. Existing WSI methods either compress densely sampled patches into global representations or use pretrained vision-language models with heuristic region selection, weakening links between predictions and morphology or lacking pathology-trained observation policies. We present AdaptivePath, an active-perception framework that formulates WSI evidence acquisition as sequential decision making. The Navigator learns question-agnostic abnormality-driven navigation from pathologist-reviewed labels to select observation locations and spatial extents, avoiding costly question-specific trajectory annotations. We train this policy through alternating representation learning and proximal policy optimization, followed by fine-tuning with geometric and appearance consistency objectives to stabilize focus trajectories. During inference, the Navigator hierarchically acquires sparse observations from low to high magnification under a limited ROI budget. A Morphology Interpreter converts observations into question-conditioned evidence, while the Deliberator evaluates evidence and revises intermediate answers across magnifications. The Arbiter integrates deliberation history to produce final answers. AdaptivePath achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot performance on WSI and region pathology VQA benchmarks and reaches 80.14% accuracy for cancer subtype classification across six TCGA cohorts. In a blinded diagnostic-utility study, pathologists using AdaptivePath-selected observation sequences achieve 82.9% accuracy. These results demonstrate that learned active perception enables effective and traceable visual reasoning over gigapixel pathology slides.
Pathological diagnosis is inherently multi-scale, requiring the integration of global tissue architecture at low magnification with cellular morphology at higher magnification. However, existing pathology benchmarks and vision-language models (VLMs) are still largely developed under single-scale settings, limiting their ability to learn clinically meaningful multi-magnification reasoning. Moreover, naively constructed visual question answering (VQA) tasks may be susceptible to text-only or superficial visual shortcuts, leading to unreliable assessments of visual understanding. To address these limitations, we introduce a benchmark and training framework for shortcut-resistant cross-scale pathology reasoning. We design an Adversarial Text-only Screening strategy for semantic reasoning questions and a Structure-controlled Distractor Sampling strategy for visual grounding questions, encouraging models to rely on cross-scale visual evidence. Based on this pipeline, we construct PathScale-VQA, a high-quality cross-scale pathology VQA benchmark with 10,373 multiple-choice questions grounded in 1,368 diagnostic paths across multiple magnification levels. Building on the semantic reasoning set, PathScale-R1 is optimized through Difficulty-driven Reasoning Distillation supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning with a Scale-aware Reasoning Structure reward, which encourages the use of evidence across magnifications. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance of PathScale-R1 on cross-scale reasoning tasks and effective transfer to conventional single-scale pathology VQA. Our code is available at https://github.com/iMVR-PL/PathScale-R1.
Pathology vision-language models (VLMs) have recently progressed rapidly and are commonly evaluated by answer accuracy on pathology VQA benchmarks. However, we dig into current evaluations and identify three overlooked issues: 1) Visual evidence is not always necessary. For instance, Gemini-3-Pro achieves 53.5% average accuracy across 5 VQA benchmarks without any visual input. 2) Domain training can improve accuracy without proportional gains in visual binding. Compared with Qwen2.5-VL-7B, Patho-R1-7B exhibits a 5.8-point lower multimodal gain and a 3.7-point lower attention IoU. 3) Entity-level attention is diffuse and weakly query-specific. On PathVG, attention maps remain highly correlated across different entity queries. These issues can lead to substantial misjudgments of pathology VLMs' actual multimodal capabilities. To this end, we present PathBind, a benchmark comprising 2,600 samples: PathBind-VQA with 1,500 questions across six dimensions, PathBind-PTA with 600 questions from a private pathology teaching atlas, and PathBind-Grounding with 500 expert-curated region-level samples. Each component undergoes task-specific automated filtering and expert review to reduce textual shortcuts and improve entity-region correspondence. We evaluate 18 representative VLMs on VQA samples of PathBind and five existing pathology VQA benchmarks, and further evaluate 10 VLMs on PathBind-Grounding and PathVG. Results show that current pathology VLMs still exhibit a substantial gap between answer-side performance and visual-semantic binding.