An AI-Based Decision-Support Pipeline for Day-Ahead Photovoltaic Forecasting

Reliable photovoltaic (PV) forecasts are needed for low-carbon energy systems, but newly deployed sites often have short, imperfect records. This makes standard day-ahead forecasting difficult: persistence and physical baselines can be sensitive to calibration and timestamp alignment, while single machine-learning models may capture only one structure in the data and overstate skill under non-temporal validation. We study this problem at a United Kingdom charging-station site, where PV forecast errors affect charging availability, storage scheduling, and downstream control. Using measured inverter output and publicly available meteorological inputs, we develop a deployment-oriented environmental-AI pipeline for day-ahead hourly PV forecasting. The pipeline corrects timestamp conventions, constructs leakage-safe solar-geometry and clearness-index features, adds short-term atmospheric context, and combines complementary predictors through validation-learned stacking. Against smart persistence, a clear-sky baseline that adjusts recent PV output using expected clear-sky irradiance, the best ensemble reduces daylight normalised RMSE by about 32% under random day-blocked evaluation and 9% under the stricter rolling-origin protocol. It also reduces daylight RMSE relative to the strongest individual machine-learning baseline by 6.6% and 6.4%, respectively. The results show that physics-aware stacking can support PV forecasts from limited site data, but its value depends on model class, evaluation protocol, and deployment context.

PARA-PV: Physics-Aware Retrieval-Augmented PV Prediction Based on Frozen Foundation Model and Distribution Shift Correction

Accurate photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting is essential for reliable grid dispatch and renewable energy integration, yet it remains challenging because PV generation is jointly shaped by weather variability, day-night transitions, regime-dependent dynamics, and strict physical constraints. We propose PARA-PV, a Physics-Aware Retrieval-Augmented framework that embeds physical knowledge throughout the forecasting process. The framework first encodes multivariate PV observations into patch-level representations and, through a physics-aware retrieval-augmented learner, retrieves historical patches and analog trajectories that are consistent with the current window in temporal shape, power level, PV operating state, and intra-day period; this yields a physically grounded base forecast. To supplement local memory with broader temporal knowledge, the base forecast is then calibrated against a frozen Chronos time-series foundation-model prior through a lightweight residual adapter, so that general temporal regularities are adapted to PV-specific dynamics without overriding the physically grounded prediction. Because residual conditional distribution shifts persist when weather and diurnal regimes change, a physics-aware distribution shift correction module subsequently adjusts the preliminary forecast using power, weather, timestamp, and day/night conditions, applying gated mean-shift and scale corrections selectively. Finally, a physics-constrained loss function partitions the samples into peak, ramping, night-time, and regular regimes and adaptively reweights their error contributions, preventing the dominant regular regime from suppressing learning of operationally critical states. Our code is available at https://github.com/weican1103/PARA-PV.

Time series Foundation Models based on Physics-Informed Synthetic Histories for Cold-Start Photovoltaic Forecasting

At commissioning time, Photovoltaic (PV) operators must forecast production before target-site observations are available, limiting the direct use of standard supervised forecasters. This cold-start setting is addressed with a zero-shot pipeline that generates a synthetic production history from plant metadata and meteorological covariates, enabling time-series foundation models (TSFMs) to forecast through inference-time conditioning. Five TSFMs are benchmarked against classical baselines under strict Cold-Start Baseline, Real Feedback, and Self-Forecast Feedback strategies. The evaluation spans $440$ PV sites across four datasets and diverse climate regimes. Covariate-aware foundation models outperform baselines by approximately $1.7-2\times$: TabPFN-TS achieves the lowest error under Real Feedback (MAE $0.514$, RMSE $0.721$ $kWh$ ${kWp}^{-1}$ ${d}^{-1}$), while Chronos-2 is most robust under Self-Forecast Feedback. Performance is largely insensitive to the synthetic-history source, indicating that accuracy is driven more by the availability of plausible temporal context than by the specific generator.