Computer vision (CV) and machine learning (ML) offer new tools for cultural heritage (CH) artifact analysis, but the CV/ML pipeline remains largely inaccessible to CH domain experts, who lack the background to configure, train, or assess models. We present AmalthAI, an open-source CV platform that bridges this gap, enabling non-ML CH experts to independently produce and validate archaeologically meaningful findings. The interface covers dataset management, training, and inference for classification, segmentation, and object detection, with Kubeflow and Katib handling scalable training and hyperparameter search. Grad-CAM localizes the image region behind a prediction, and a vision-language model (VLM) adds a text description of it for expert review. Since archaeological data is often state-owned or rights-encumbered and cannot leave institutional custody, AmalthAI's self-hostable deployment ensures sensitive data is kept within premises. We test the platform on an archaeological use case built on a custom dataset of clay textile imprints, where CH experts trained and validated segmentation, and classification models for hypothesis testing. We provide the implementation code at https://github.com/TEXTaiLES/AmalthAI.
In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for AI coding agents. Layered on top, an open-source RSE-Plugins ecosystem encodes accumulated RSE knowledge as a Plugin-Agent-Skill hierarchy spanning scientific Python practice, domain-specific knowledge, a six-phase research-and-implement workflow, and project lifecycle management. Scientific software is judged less by raw code quality than by whether it can be cited, audited, reproduced, and extended. Off-the-shelf AI coding agents, optimized against commercial software benchmarks, are poorly calibrated for this setting: they ignore the conventions of the scientific Python libraries they invoke, mishandle sensitive or embargoed data, and leave decision trails that are difficult to reconstruct after the fact. We report on twenty months of practice at a university-based research software engineering (RSE) center, where RSEs embedded across astronomy, earth and climate science, agriculture, and health projects worked to close this gap. We characterize the recurring infrastructure, governance, and process challenges of adopting Agentic AI inside a multi-domain RSE center, describe the platform and plugin design, and distill operational lessons from real scientific software deployments. Together, the platform and plugins shift AI coding agents from generic code generators into domain-aware collaborators that respect community norms and produce auditable provenance of technical reasoning.
Recent attempts to combine large language models (LLMs) with causal discovery ask models to infer pairwise directions, propose graph structures, or inject language-model outputs as priors and constraints. These approaches promise faster analysis, but they also obscure whether a causal evidence is supported by data and assumptions or by textual associations, prompt artifacts and hallucinated mechanisms. We argue for a different role for agents in causal discovery. Agents should inspect data, retrieve context, explain method assumptions and clarify graph outputs, but they should not supply edges, orientations, priors, constraints or causal conclusions. We propose the principle that agents assist the workflow, while causal claims remain grounded in data, explicit assumptions, formal algorithms, diagnostics and user or domain-expert decisions. We instantiate this principle in causal-learn+, an online platform that coordinates data analysis, preprocessing, method recommendation, expert-knowledge incorporation, formal discovery and interpretation around the algorithmic ecosystem of causal-learn. A case study on Big Five personality data illustrates agent-assisted pipeline of causal discovery without turning language-model unreliability into causal evidence. The platform is available at causallearn.com.