Don't Repeat Yourself: Stopping Verbatim Loops at Sampling Time

Large Language Models generate text autoregressively, but open-ended generation is prone to verbatim looping, in which models repeat spans already present in context. Standard defenses such as repetition, presence, and frequency penalties and n-gram blocking act on token recurrence rather than the sequential structure of a loop, and often suppress looping only at strengths that also degrade formatting or fluency. We propose Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY), a sampling-time logit adjustment that penalizes a candidate token only when generating it would extend the current suffix into an exact continuation of a span seen earlier in the context. Sequence breakers protect chat templates and formatting tokens. Across models from 1.5B to 120B parameters, nine prompt families, and a 600-pair human study, DRY reduces suffix-extension rate by 47% while improving lexical diversity. An intervention-matched placebo produces no comparable reduction, identifying suffix matching as the operative mechanism. On AWQ-quantized 70B and 120B models, DRY reduces loop rate by roughly half while preserving MT-Bench, MMLU, and GSM8K performance, whereas standard alternatives lose measurable ground. DRY has been adopted by popular open-source LLM inference frameworks including llama.cpp, ExLlamaV2, and text-generation-webui, highlighting its practical impact on text generation.

Bayesian Repetition Penalty: A Principled Adjacent-Conditional Framework for Reversing Attention Collapse in Autoregressive Language Models

Attention collapse in autoregressive language models -- manifested as repetitive token loops where the model becomes trapped in self-reinforcing attractors -- is a persistent pathology that existing decoding-time heuristics fail to address at its root cause. We present a principled framework that penalises or compensates anomalous confidence arising from collapsed generation patterns, by comparing a token's observed frequency against its corpus prior through an adjacent-conditional probability construction. The resulting self-normalising penalty ratio $R=f(m,n,p)/f(np,n,p)$ requires no ad hoc standardisation and admits a closed-form logit offset with zero approximation error. The correction is isolated from the loss gradient and accumulated into a frozen output-layer bias via exponential moving average, enabling deployment as a repair mechanism for models that have already collapsed without requiring intrusive modifications to standard training pipelines. Experimental validation on a 1.5B-parameter model demonstrates that the frozen-bias mechanism can rescue a model already trapped in a collapsed attractor, reducing 2-gram repetition from 0.073 to near 0 while preserving generation quality.

Gauge dependence and structured-output corruption in sign-branched repetition penalties: measurements across models, inference stacks, and alternative repetition controls

The multiplicative repetition penalty shipped across the LLM inference ecosystem (HuggingFace, vLLM, llama$.$cpp, and a dozen further engines) branches on the sign of each raw logit (divide positives by theta, multiply negatives). But the softmax is unchanged by adding a constant to every logit, so a model's logit zero-point is arbitrary (a gauge choice), and the sign-branch reads it. Two measurable consequences follow. (1) The penalty is not well-defined: re-centering a model's logits by a constant is a provable no-op at theta=1, yet at a routine theta=1.3 it changes 58-96% of greedy tokens, while subtractive and normalized penalties change none; real checkpoints sit at widely different zero-points, so a fixed repetition_penalty is a different operation on every model. (2) It corrupts structured output: on 200 real-world JSON schemas, theta=1.3 drops the rate of valid, schema-conformant output from 97% to 23%. Applying the penalty to normalized log-probabilities instead of raw logits removes the gauge dependence by construction; HuggingFace's beam search has applied its processor chain, penalty included, to log-probabilities since at least v4.0.0, so repetition_penalty already names two different operators depending on decoding strategy. Because equal theta is not equal strength across the two operators, we also compare them at matched suppression, calibrated per model by search: there the normalized operator is statistically no worse on any quality metric measured, but on four of seven models it cannot match the raw operator's suppression at theta >= 1.15, and on six of seven at theta=1.3, the setting where the corruption was measured. This note gives the mechanism, the measurements (five models up to 7B; two code models; both effects replicated inside vLLM and llama$.$cpp through their own samplers), the per-model calibration map, and the normalized variant.