Continual temporal knowledge graph (TKG) reasoning aims to continuously incorporate newly emerging facts while preserving previously acquired knowledge. Replay-based continual learning has achieved promising performance by revisiting historical representations. However, existing methods primarily focus on what to replay, while largely overlooking how replayed representations should be integrated with current ones. Such direct integration often gives rise to two critical forms of representation conflict: \textit{norm domination} and \textit{semantic blurring}, ultimately degrading continual reasoning performance. To address these challenges, we propose MA-DAR (Manifold-Aligned Dynamic Adaptive Routing), a lightweight plug-and-play framework for replay representation fusion. MA-DAR first aligns replayed and current representations onto a shared manifold to alleviate distribution discrepancies. It then employs a dynamic gating mechanism to learn dimension-wise fusion weights, adaptively determining the contribution of replayed and current representations to the fused representation. Furthermore, a polarization regularizer encourages more decisive routing behaviors by discouraging ambiguous gating decisions, resulting in more stable and effective knowledge integration. Extensive experiments on four public continual TKG benchmarks demonstrate that MA-DAR consistently improves the performance of representative TKG encoders while remaining effective under different replay settings. Comprehensive ablation studies and visualization analyses further verify the effectiveness of manifold alignment and dynamic adaptive routing in mitigating representation conflicts and improving continual reasoning.
Vision foundation models (VFMs) exhibit complementary strengths shaped by their pretraining objectives. Yet prevailing methods for multi-task dense prediction still train an entire backbone, either by fine-tuning it under multi-task supervision or by distilling multiple VFMs in an additional stage. We ask whether downstream learning can instead compose the frozen representations already available in foundation models. Dense tasks require composite representations that no individual expert provides alone. Realizing them is difficult: simple fusion yields only marginal gains over the best single expert, while learned routing tends to collapse toward candidates that are strong at initialization, starving newly initialized composers of training signal. We present COVE, which constructs pairwise composite candidates through Synergy Composers and routes among raw and composite candidates with a Task-Conditioned Router. To prevent this collapse, COVE combines Gaussian logit perturbation for exploration with counterfactual supervision that selectively increases under-credited routing allocations. On NYUD-v2 and PASCAL-Context, COVE matches or surpasses ViT-L-based methods on most tasks using a smaller frozen encoder pool and roughly half the computation of recent VFM-based competitors, while exceeding the best single frozen expert on every task.