Reliable operation of modern distribution networks requires timely identification of operational risks and anomalous events under pervasive uncertainty. In practice, operators must identify risks that are inherent in stochastic yet in-distribution conditions, and anomalies that correspond to out-of-distribution behaviors such as unusual load patterns, extreme weather or cyber-physical attacks. This paper addresses this joint risk and anomaly identification problem for optimal distribution network operation and proposes a deep reinforcement learning framework that is explicitly uncertainty aware. We integrate distributional and Bayesian deep reinforcement learning to realize a second- order uncertainty quantification scheme that decomposes total uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic components, which are respectively used to characterize inherent risk and out-of- distribution anomalies. The resulting epistemic estimates drive both exploration during training and out-of-distribution detec- tion with fallback control during deployment, whereas aleatoric estimates are used to characterize intrinsic operational risk. Simulation results demonstrate the performance of our DRL agent and the effectiveness of the uncertainty quantification.
Autonomous driving risk identification aims to determine which observed object is likely to become safety-critical to the ego vehicle. Existing approaches typically predict scene-level accidents, infer risk objects indirectly from ego behavior, or apply geometric checks after trajectory forecasting, without directly using predicted ego--object relations for risk-source localization. We propose RiskWorld, an object-centric latent world model that identifies risk from the imagined evolution of each candidate relative to the ego vehicle. RiskWorld combines pretrained predictive video representations with structured ego--object histories, contextualizes observed interactions, and rolls relation-aware object states into the future using RSSM-style latent dynamics. It decodes the rollout into object-level risk scores, supported by auxiliary future-relation and temporal-risk predictions. Inference uses only observations up to the current time, while logged futures provide training supervision. On RiskBench, RiskWorld achieves the best overall F1 of 63.0\% and the lowest false-alarm rate of 2.1\%. Further analyses show that the learned rollout captures the evolution of object-level risk before critical events, while RiskWorld's selections preserve planning-critical information under filtered observation.