Large language models (LLMs) rely on tool calling as a fundamental agent capability, enabling them to invoke external systems and complete tasks beyond text generation. However, clean end-to-end (E2E) success cannot identify where a tool-use failure originates or how it propagates through a call. We introduce ToolRobustBench, a stage-wise diagnostic benchmark for tool-calling agents, where a tool-calling agent is an LLM system that selects a tool, supplies structured arguments, and interprets its returned feedback. ToolRobustBench aligns four perturbation families with the tool-use pipeline: tool-interface, user-intent, tool-output/observation, and runtime-environment perturbations. It attributes failures to tool selection, schema grounding, argument binding, tool-output/runtime-feedback handling, and E2E task success. Experiments on 15,456 single-family instances across 7 models, 16 sampled local tools, 4 perturbation families, and 14 subtypes show high but non-uniform clean performance and substantial robustness degradation, with tool-output/observation perturbation the dominant bottleneck. Mixed-family experiments reveal non-additive failure patterns that are not explained by isolated single-family results. Thus, ToolRobustBench provides a deterministic and cascade-aware benchmark for diagnosing robustness beyond clean tool-calling accuracy;
Visual-language models (VLMs) frequently struggle with robustness issues in real-world situations due to low- or varying-quality input images. In this paper, we aim at analyzing VLMs' robustness by applying perturbations and distortions to the input images, such as blur or low contrast. Toward this goal, we propose BRUCE (Benchmarking Robustness Under Corruption Escalation), a multimodal reasoning fragility framework for scientific vision-language reasoning. State-of-the-art evaluation frameworks/studies primarily focus on clean-task accuracy and rarely analyze how reasoning stability degrades across robustness dimensions. Besides varying over a wide-range of input perturbations, BRUCE employs two novel metrics -- Robustness Corruption Index (RCI) and Traversal-RCI (T-RCI) -- to quantify how rapidly multimodal reasoning performance deteriorates in VLMs as visual corruption severity increases under progressive perturbation scaling. We evaluate BRUCE across chemistry and mathematical reasoning tasks for multiple datasets, while analyzing corruption-induced prediction failures in terms of four high-level reasoning domains: OCR-dependent reasoning, spatial reasoning, symbolic reasoning, and semantic failures, with each containing fine-grained corruption specific failure subtypes, thereby enabling an interpretable failure analysis.
Haochen Jiang, Jialei Pan, Yuzhe Sun +4cs.CV cs.AI
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-satellite cross-view geo-localization matches UAV images against satellite imagery and has achieved impressive accuracy on clean (non-degraded) image benchmarks. In real-world flights, however, UAV observations are frequently affected by adverse weather, illumination changes, platform motion, sensor noise, and compression, while the robustness of existing methods under such degradations remains largely unexamined. In this paper, we present UAVSat-Deg, a large-scale robustness benchmark for degraded UAV-satellite geo-localization, comprising University-1652-Deg and SUES-200-Deg. UAVSat-Deg covers 27 corruption types, including 19 core and 8 compound corruptions, at three severity levels, supports bidirectional drone-to-satellite and satellite-to-drone retrieval as well as multi-height UAV acquisition, and contains more than 11.7 million pre-generated corrupted test images. Benchmarking representative methods under this protocol reveals substantial robustness gaps, particularly under severe and compound corruptions. To address this problem, we propose ReLATE, a Reliable Evidence Learning framework with Adaptive Token Evidence Regulation, which realizes reliability-adaptive feature fusion during descriptor construction. ReLATE estimates a structure-smoothed reliability field over visual tokens, aggregates trustworthy local evidence, and adaptively integrates it into query-derived representations; the regulated query representations are then combined with the CLS-token and GeM-pooled branches to form the final cross-view descriptor. Across both test sets and retrieval directions, ReLATE achieves the best average corrupted-test performance among the compared methods while maintaining competitive accuracy on clean images. The code and dataset will be available at https://github.com/JHC626/ReLATE.
Minhyeok Lee, Chiyoung Kim, Chanhoe Gu +5cs.AI cs.CV
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models translate natural-language commands into robot action sequences, but leading systems on the LIBERO-Plus robustness benchmark use three- to seven-billion-parameter backbones whose memory demands can exceed embedded robotic budgets. We present CoTinyVLA, a 0.9B-parameter action model on a Qwen3.5-0.8B backbone that obtains that robustness by structuring supervision instead of enlarging the model. Three components target different axes of the problem: dual-view temporal input of 16 history frames per step with textual camera and time markers; hierarchical chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation from a 35B teacher into an episode-level Plan and a chunk-level Think span over task phase, gripper state and next subaction; and paraphrase augmentation expanding 40 base commands into 800 variants. On LIBERO-Plus, spanning 10,030 perturbed tasks across seven perturbation dimensions, CoTinyVLA reaches 90.8% on Spatial, 87.3% on Object, 86.6% on Goal and 80.7% on Long, leading the strongest 7B baseline on all four suites by 4.7, 2.8, 15.9 and 3.0 points, with every margin interval excluding zero. The gains concentrate on the hardest axes of the benchmark: across the eleven published baselines none exceeds 53.2% on Robot Initial States in any suite, whereas CoTinyVLA reaches 73.6% on Goal against 39.9% for the strongest baseline. Ablations show the three components to be separable by perturbation axis, and at a matched image budget how frames are divided between the two cameras and across time accounts for 8.6 points on its own. Closed-loop inference peaks at 2.25 GiB of allocated GPU memory, and paired interventions show the episode Plan to be load-bearing: replacing it with an empty or contradictory span costs 40 to 45 points of success. Structured supervision thus lets a 0.9B backbone exceed all of them. Code: https://github.com/BrainJellyPie/CoTinyVLA
Environmental illusions (eg., shadows, reflections, and tire marks) are naturally existing yet overlooked phenomena in real-world driving environments. They can disturb visual perception, leading to misinterpretation of the scene and posing serious safety risks to autonomous driving (AD) systems. However, existing researches largely overlook these phenomena, leaving a critical gap. To address this issue, we study AD robustness through the lane perception perspective, a fundamental task supporting core functions like cruise control and lane centering. We focus on two representative models: conventional lane detection (LD) and vision-language model-based systems (ADVLMs). In this work, we introduce the first benchmark, LanEvil++, for evaluating the robustness of lane perception under environmental illusions. LanEvil++ encompasses 14 types of illusions and leverages the CARLA simulator to generate 94 high-fidelity, fully controllable 3D scenes, yielding a dataset of 90,292 annotated images, 1,596 video clips, and 41,855 visual question answering pairs. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that environmental illusions substantially degrade the performance of state-of-the-art LD methods. On average, LD models experience a 5.27% drop in Accuracy and a 10.49% decline in F1-score, while ADVLMs show a 2.03% reduction in GPT-score and a 0.75% drop in Language-score. Among all illusions, shadows emerge as the most disruptive factor, reducing accuracy by up to 7.20%. Furthermore, closed-loop simulations reveal that these illusions can lead to incorrect driving decisions. Complementary real-world case studies highlight safety-critical failures in actual traffic scenes. To enhance robustness, we propose the Multimodal Illusion Defense Approach (MIDA). MIDA achieves substantial gains under challenging conditions, boosting robustness by 4.23% on LD models and 3.82% on ADVLMs.
Plasma diagnostic models for tokamak fusion devices are almost universally evaluated on clean, complete sensor data. In practice, fusion diagnostics fail regularly: acquisition systems start late, individual sensors die, and signal dropouts cluster precisely when a plasma disruption is approaching. We present the first systematic robustness benchmark for plasma diagnostic ML using the TokaMark dataset of 11,573 MAST shots, evaluating XGBoost, LSTM, Transformer, and the TokaMark CNN baseline across six physically-grounded failure scenarios and three imputation strategies. We introduce the Robustness Score (RS) for standardized cross-architecture comparison. Our central finding is that disruption-proximate sensor failure (corruption injected in the final window timesteps) collapses sequence model performance (LSTM +212% NRMSE) while a statistical feature model remains comparatively stable (XGBoost +37%). Forward-fill imputation eliminates nearly all degradation from random dropout for sequence models (LSTM +57% to ~0%), but offers little help when the end of the window is corrupted. Shot-level alarm evaluation using ground-truth disruption timestamps reveals that LSTM alarm detection collapses to TPR=0.00 under proximate sensor failure, while mean-fill imputation recovers it to TPR=1.00, a reversal of the pattern observed in NRMSE. Plasma current emerges as the single most critical diagnostic across all architectures (+73% to +140% upon removal). Code, data, and trained checkpoints are available at https://github.com/Neerav-Gupta/tokamark-robustness.
Multimodal industrial anomaly inspection assistants are a critical component of next-generation smart factories, enabling interactive vision-language-based querying. However, multimodal large language models remain impractical for on-site deployment due to prohibitive computational demands and privacy risks from cloud-based inference. Compact multimodal small language models (MSLMs) offer a deployable alternative, yet progress is constrained by the lack of comprehensive robustness analyses and meaningfully challenging benchmarks that reflect real-world industrial conditions. To address this gap, we develop RobustMAD, the first deployment-motivated benchmark, designed to comprehensively evaluate model robustness through diverse open-ended queries spanning object understanding, anomaly detection, unanswerable problems, and visual quality degradations. Contrary to conventional assumptions, top-performing MSLMs exhibit promising capabilities, surprisingly outperforming even the larger GPT-5 Nano. However, they still fall short of safety-critical requirements, and RobustMAD reveals critical robustness gaps that pose operational risks. In particular, three recurring failure modes emerge: (i) fragile multimodal grounding under fine-grained distinctions or degraded visual conditions, (ii) insufficiently comprehensive responses, and (iii) weak logical grounding on unanswerable or ill-posed queries, leading to hallucinated outputs. Grounded in these insights, we provide actionable guidance for the design of next-generation multimodal industrial inspection assistants that leverage their promising competence. Code is available at https://github.com/en-research/RobustMAD.
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance on OCR-based benchmarks and increasingly focused on text-rich understanding, but their robustness under controlled visual degradation remains insufficiently understood. This gap is critical for OCR reasoning, where visual corruption can induce OCR errors and structural distortions, thereby introducing uncertainty into the reasoning task. To systematically study this problem, we introduce OCR-Robust, a benchmark designed for evaluating OCR reasoning robustness under visual perturbations. It contains 812 samples across two complementary subsets: OCR1.0, covering documents, scene text, receipts, handwriting, and mathematical content, and OCR2.0, focusing on charts, geometry diagrams, and tables. To enable efficient yet informative evaluation, we conduct a pilot study over 18 candidate perturbations and select 5 representative types at 3 severity levels each based on their impact and cross-model discriminability. We evaluate robustness using clean accuracy, Relative Corruption Retention (RCR), Worst-Case Retention (WCR), and a composite Corruption Robustness Index (CRI), and benchmark 18 models spanning proprietary systems, open-source VLMs, and OCR+LLM pipelines. Our results show that higher clean accuracy does not necessarily imply stronger robustness, and that models can suffer pronounced degradation in the worst case on OCR tasks that are sensitive to structure, and charts and tables are substantially more fragile than document-like inputs under perturbation.