RIPPLE: Generating Multi-Channel Phase, Not Recovering It

Generative models synthesize magnitude spectra with high fidelity, while phase is delegated to a recovery module---Griffin--Lim, a vocoder, or a latent decoder---applied independently to each channel. For multi-channel waveforms this delegation is costly: the physical content of spatial audio and three-component seismograms lives in the phase relationships between channels, precisely what channel-independent recovery cannot produce. The cost is also invisible, since the magnitude-based metrics common to both fields barely move when inter-channel phase coherence collapses---so a pipeline can discard the physical information in its output while still scoring well. We argue that phase should be generated, not recovered, and present RIPPLE (Rectified Inter-channel Phase with Prior-based LEarning), which reinterprets Griffin--Lim as a phase **prior** rather than a final estimator: initialized from the source phase, this prior carries the inter-channel structure to be preserved, and a rectified flow refines it toward the target under an explicit inter-channel phase loss. Tested on first-order ambisonics environment transfer and seismic cross-station translation---two physically unrelated domains---RIPPLE outperforms recovery-based pipelines on the coherence metrics that downstream analyses consume. The seismic case is decisive: across architecturally distinct generators, per-channel recovery leaves S-wave polarization error near the $57.3^\circ$ random expectation, whereas learned phase reduces it to $33.8^\circ$.

Learning Earthquake Wave Arrival Time Picking from Labels with Inaccuracies

Inaccurately labeled training data, or "label noise", poses a significant threat to the integrity of supervised machine learning models. This corruption directly degrades performance by teaching the model erroneous mappings between features and labels, which leads to poor generalization and reduced accuracy on properly labeled validation and test data. Current seismological applications mainly rely on large-scale training sets or data augmentation to reduce the label-noise impact, which can be labor-intensive and costly. Here, we introduce a Label Noise-Contrastive Robust Learning (LaNCoR) approach that can effectively handle noisy labels in seismic signal processing tasks, without requiring large-scale training datasets. In this approach, the input waveform feature and label representation distributions are aligned in the feature space to correct mislabeling and reduce its impact on the training process. We present LaNCoR's performance on the task of P-phase arrival-time picking of real microseismic data using two baseline models and training approaches. Our results indicate that LaNCoR can improve performance by up to 28.8% across performance metrics. This approach holds great promise for model training in seismology and geosciences.