Semantic change detection (SCD) is a bitemporal dense-prediction task that jointly identifies changed regions and their semantic states before and after change. Unlike single-image segmentation or binary change detection, SCD couples two temporal inputs with timestamp-wise semantic prediction, change localization, and final semantic-change decoding, creating adversarial dependencies that are not captured by conventional robustness protocols. We present a task-specific evaluation framework that separates output-side attack objectives from input-side temporal perturbation access, enabling systematic analysis of component vulnerability and cross-temporal propagation. Experiments on four datasets and six representative CNN-, Transformer-, and state-space-based models evaluate component-level and temporal objectives, single- and dual-timestamp perturbations, multiple attack methods, and cross-architecture transferability. The results show that final semantic-change predictions can be severely corrupted even when binary change localization remains comparatively stable, and that perturbations or attack objectives associated with one timestamp can propagate to the prediction of the other. These behaviors occur across different architecture families, while direct cross-model transfer remains considerably weaker than white-box attacks. The study demonstrates that adversarial robustness in SCD depends on the complete bitemporal prediction pathway rather than on an individual branch or backbone family, and provides a structured protocol for evaluating robustness in coupled bitemporal image analysis. Code is available at https://github.com/EricYu97/AdvSCD.
Afnan Aloraini, Viktor Schlegel, Goran Nenadic +1cs.CL
Automatic semantic change detection aims to identify how word meanings shift over time, offering insights into both linguistic and societal change. Despite recent progress in computational lexical semantic change (LSC), existing benchmarks and methods struggle to capture bi-directional semantic change, particularly cases where words simultaneously gain and lose senses. This problem is especially challenging for words that have both slang and standard meanings. To address these gaps, we introduce two complementary benchmark datasets. The Bi-Directional Lexical Semantic Change (BD-LSC) dataset captures sense gain, sense loss, and stability across three time periods, enabling the study of complex semantic trajectories. The SlangTrack Word Sense Disambiguation (ST-WSD) dataset provides fine-grained, instance-level sense annotations for words combining slang and standard usages, supporting systematic benchmarking of WSD and semantic change detection models. Using these benchmarks, we systematically evaluate models across different methodological families: unsupervised clustering using contextualised embeddings, supervised machine learning, transformer-based models, and state-of-the-art large language models. Among the evaluated systems, the few-shot GPT-4o model achieved the strongest aggregate performance on Exact Sense Match (ESM) and multi-label accuracy; however, Macro-F1 scores near 0.5 across all systems show that rare slang senses remain difficult, which we identify as the central open challenge.
This article situates large language models (LLMs) within the longer history of computational approaches to concept analysis in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS). We examine what LLMs add to existing methods, how they inherit longstanding problems, and review recent case studies that employ them. In the first part, we reconstruct computational conceptual history before LLMs by bringing together three strands of work: early digital methods in HPSS, distributional approaches from digital history and related research, and lexical semantic change detection. We provide an overview of the main challenges and opportunities, focusing on corpus construction, operationalization and modelling choices, and evaluation and interpretation. In the second part, we turn to the era of LLMs, starting with a short introduction to LLMs before reviewing LLM-based work on lexical semantic change detection and relevant case studies in HPSS. We then revisit the earlier methodological questions, showing how issues of corpus construction, model choice and training data, operationalization trade-offs, and evaluation and interpretation play out in LLM-based workflows.