A green solvent screening tool for emerging materials via uncertainty aware, transformer enhanced transfer learning

Accurate prediction of solubility remains a central challenge across materials science and sustainable chemistry. In particular due to emerging technologies like organic and hybrid photovoltaics, batteries, and catalysis, solvent usage is expected to increase significantly within the coming years. Therefore, substituting solvents with greener alternatives is vital. This is where machine learning can have substantial impact. However, the limited data on critical parameters of solubility significantly constraints machine learning efficacy. In this work, we transfer a pre-trained foundational model on QM9 targets to our application with minimal data requirements. Additionally, the pipeline integrates uncertainty quantification, allowing the user to gauge the confidence of the predictions. As baseline, we succeed in predicting the Hansen solubility parameters and Dielectric Constant for which extensive databases exist. Importantly, we achieve high model performance on additional targets, such as Gutmann Donor and Acceptor numbers, where the available data is extremely limited. Overall, we augment data on solubility descriptors by orders of magnitude with high quality predictions. For effective dissemination, we deploy easy-to-use, easily integrateable with high throughput labs, customizable tool for ranking and screening possible solvent substitutes. Finally, we rediscovered known green solvent alternatives and proposed new candidates proving its relevance for finding eco-friendly solvents.

SC3: The Multi-Solvent Solubility Challenge and Benchmark

Solubility prediction is a standard benchmark in computational chemistry, yet multi-solvent models which reportedly approach the experimental-noise ceiling (i.e. the aleatoric limit) are not yet reliable enough to be deployed. We argue that this gap is partly artefactual: published benchmarks differ in curation policies, evaluate on count-weighted RMSE that hides failure on tail-heavy solvent distributions, and treat the widely cited 0.6-0.8 log S inter-laboratory figure as the aleatoric ceiling even though it reflects worst-case, not expected, disagreement. We introduce SC3, a multi-solvent solubility benchmark built on BigSolDB v2.1 with three contributions: (i) a reproducible curation pipeline yielding 101,535 measurements over 1,327 solutes and 206 solvents, with a recalibrated aleatoric floor of 0.106 log S-roughly 6 times tighter than the conventional figure; (ii) nested Gold/Silver/Bronze consensus tiers with per-point standard deviation, three leakage-checked splits, and a multi-solvent metric suite (PS-RMSE, Z-RMSE); and (iii) a 31-model benchmark across six families, whose best Bronze PS-RMSE sits at 5 times the aleatoric limit, and we observe this is a gap unclosed by any deep alternative tested. We perform three follow-on analyses: data scaling, transfer from quantum-chemistry solvation energies, and feature-level attribution, which demonstrates that calibrated per-point uncertainty is a reusable infrastructure for diagnosis beyond point prediction.