Real-world object detection operates under ambiguous supervision, where unlabeled regions may correspond to missing annotations of known objects or genuinely unknown categories. These challenges have been addressed separately in Sparsely Annotated Object Detection (SAOD) and Open-World Object Detection (OWOD). In practice, their co-occurrence remains an open problem. To address this problem, we introduce Sparsely Annotated Open-World Object Detection (SA-OWOD), a new task that jointly considers sparse supervision and the presence of unseen categories. We propose Dual-Perspective Object Discovery (DPOD), a unified framework that jointly models unlabeled known and unknown instances via two complementary mechanisms. The Known Target Recovery Module (KTRM) recovers supervision for unlabeled known instances and explicitly regularizes the feature space to separate known and unknown representations. Complementarily, the Dual-Disagreement Target Generator (DDTG) identifies reliable unknown candidates through cross-view semantic inconsistency. By integrating these modules, DPOD resolves contradictory supervision signals caused by ambiguous unlabeled regions. As a result, it prevents misclassification between known and unknown objects and stabilizes the decision boundaries. Experimental results on sparsely annotated open-world benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing open-world detection methods, particularly in detecting unknown objects.
Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho, Osmar Abilio de Carvalho Junior, Anesmar Olino de Albuquerque +1cs.CV
Semantic segmentation in remote sensing requires costly pixel-level annotations, and nearly every problem demands a new dataset since models rarely transfer across sensors, platforms, or geographies. Existing human-in-the-loop frameworks expand sparse clicks into dense supervision via auxiliary machinery (pseudo-labels, propagation, CRFs, foundation-model prompts, auxiliary heads), all operating on the model's predictive distribution. A confidently wrong pixel is indistinguishable from a confidently correct one in that distribution by construction, so no rule reading it can separate the two; the distinguishing signal is external to the model. This paper hypothesizes that expert clicks targeting confident model errors, not arbitrary pixels, suffice to match dense supervision, with no expansion machinery. iSAGE (Iterative Sparse Annotation Guided by Expert) realizes this hypothesis on an integrated open-source platform, where an error-weighted loss amplifies the gradient at each click and the annotation record itself is the dataset, extensible, correctable, and auditable. Experiments use a minimum-effort regime: at most one labeled pixel per class per frame. On BsB Aerial, iSAGE recovers 97.2% of dense supervision (74.79% mIoU on 0.040% of pixels) with contrasting class dynamics: amorphous classes (permeable areas) saturate from the seed, while small classes (cars) require late-iteration effort. On ISPRS Vaihingen (external benchmark), iSAGE reaches 76.78% mIoU with 0.011% of pixels, matching the dense baseline (76.65%) and exceeding all published methods. Under the same pipeline, four output-reading mechanisms (oracle entropy across budgets 1--100x, pseudo-labels across thresholds 0.90--0.99, CRF-based propagation, uniform random) plateau 7.4 to 14.5 pp below iSAGE. Across 31 surveyed methods, iSAGE is the only iterative human-in-the-loop framework operating without auxiliary machinery.