ThinkProbe: Beyond Accuracy -- Structural Profiling of Open-Ended LLM Reasoning Traces via Non-Generative Thought Graphs

We present ThinkProbe, a framework for structural analysis of LLM reasoning traces. ThinkProbe converts each trace into a Thought Graph a directed graph with cycles, 8 node types, and 6 edge types and derives a 19-metric five-dimensional cognitive profile (5D-CP: Breadth, Depth, Structure, Metacognitive, Efficiency) through a fully non-generative pipeline combining rule-based segmentation and discriminative semantic linking. Applied to 4{,}200 traces from 7 native reasoning models across 200 open-ended questions and 10 cognitive domains, ThinkProbe reveals that reasoning structure is a stable, model-level property: between-model variance exceeds between-domain variance by up to fourfold across four of five cognitive dimensions, with Structure showing genuine sensitivity to question domain, exposing qualitatively distinct cognitive profiles invisible to accuracy-based evaluation.

Learning Structural Manipulability in Gate-Level Netlists Using Graph Neural Networks

Gate-level netlists exhibit intrinsic structural properties that influence signal propagation independently of functional simulation. We define a topology-driven structural manipulability score that characterizes node-level structural flexibility using path participation, k-core embedding, symmetry, and centrality. Modeling netlists as directed graphs, we formulate node-level regression to learn this topology-derived score using graph neural networks (GNNs). Experiments on ISCAS85 and EPFL benchmarks evaluate how effectively different GNN architectures approximate this metric across held-out circuits, with hierarchical models yielding the most consistent rankings. Component-level and ablation analyses examine the contribution of individual factors. As an illustrative case study, analysis of Trojan-injected circuits using TrustHub templates reveals statistically distinguishable structural patterns, indicating that topology-based scoring provides complementary structural insight.

Evolutionary Optimization Reveals Structural Constraints on Reservoir Architecture for Spatiotemporal Chaos

Biological systems maintain function in fluctuating environments by transforming past stimulation into internal dynamical states that support future-oriented responses. Reservoir computing provides a computational analogue, but standard formulations often treat the recurrent substrate as a fixed random network and train only the readout. Here we ask how the substrate itself changes when reservoir architecture is placed under evolutionary selection for prediction. Using the Kuramoto--Sivashinsky equation as a testbed for spatiotemporal chaos, we evolved reservoirs over five construction hyperparameters: size, connectivity degree, spectral radius, input scaling, and readout regularization. Evolution reduced prediction error at the population level, extended the low-error forecast horizon, and organized the design space along a diminishing-return size--efficiency frontier. Structural analyses showed that evolved reservoirs remained within a conserved stochastic-block-model-like spectral envelope while refining low-eigenvalue modes, locking modularity to an intermediate band, and pruning connection cost within that band. Pareto analysis showed that elite reservoirs occupied a horizontal floor in the cost--modularity plane, indicating that accuracy and efficiency were achieved jointly rather than through a simple trade-off. These findings show that evolutionary optimization does not merely improve prediction, but exposes interpretable structural constraints on the recurrent substrate: it stabilizes a task-suitable dynamical class and refines the architectural degrees of freedom most relevant for prediction. Evolutionary reservoir computing therefore provides a bio-inspired framework for studying how predictive demands shape adaptive dynamical networks.

Agentic Large Language Models for Automated Structural Analysis of 3D Frame Systems

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful foundation models with strong reasoning capabilities across domains. Beyond reactive text generation, agentic LLMs enable autonomous workflow execution through modular task decomposition and coordinated tool use. In structural engineering, recent efforts have developed agentic LLMs for automated analysis of plane frames. However, their extension to 3D frames remains underexplored due to challenges in irregular geometric representation, topological consistency, and long-horizon reasoning. This paper proposes an agentic LLM framework for automated structural analysis of 3D frames from natural language inputs. Irregular 3D frames are represented by projection onto a 2D plan, where orthogonal gridlines define spatial coordinates and a matrix of number of stories encodes vertical extrusion of each grid cell. Building on this representation, the framework establishes a multi-agent pipeline: a problem analysis agent parses input into structured JSON; a floor decomposition agent derives the spatial layout of each floor; the 3D geometry is assembled by node, girder, slab, and column agents; support and load agents assign boundary and loading conditions, and code translation agents generate executable SAP2000 script. Evaluated on ten representative 3D frames, the proposed framework achieves an average accuracy of 90% across repeated trials, demonstrating consistent and reliable performance.

Multilinguality of Large Language Models From a Structural Perspective

Large language models (LLMs) have excelled in processing multiple languages through pre- and post-training on multilingual data, even though English dominates the training data. Prior work focusing on token representations has revealed how those LLMs process non-English text. Although these analyses have provided insightful findings, they fail to capture a structural view, which is an inherent property of language. In this study, we explore the multilinguality of LLMs through representational structural analysis. Our findings reveal that low-resource languages are structurally more different from English than high- and mid-resource languages, and that language-specific post-training alters their structures while preserving inter-language relationships.