Background and Objective: Quality control is a prerequisite for whole-slide image analysis, yet the benchmarks on which quality-control methods are compared share four properties that make their reported differences hard to interpret: few independent slides, annotation concentrated in a minority of them, pooled ratio metrics with no closed-form standard error, and a single inherited train/test partition. We propose a reliability protocol for such benchmarks. Methods: The protocol quantifies four sources of variability - test-set sampling, training stochasticity, partition composition, and undocumented preprocessing - a claim is reportable only if it survives all four; three of the four cost minutes of compute. We apply it to an independent reconstruction of a published diffusion-based artifact detector, evaluated on the original 24-slide partition and against a supervised baseline. Results: The method's central mechanism reproduces: the auxiliary contrastive term improves pooled F1 from 0.673 to 0.688 and replicates under a second seed (+0.0156, p = 0.031; +0.0190, p = 0.005), although it acts on pen marking rather than the artifact types cited to motivate it. Its comparative claims do not: differences between design variants, and against the supervised baseline, fall inside the uncertainty of the evaluation. Four of 24 slides carry 70% of scored annotated pixels, giving an effective sample size of 6.2, and the inherited partition sits at the 7th percentile. An unreported tissue-restriction step excludes 41.4% of out-of-focus annotation against 2.6% of air bubble; such a gate is confounded with blur by construction. Conclusions: Small-cohort benchmarks support far weaker conclusions than current reporting implies. The four checks are cheap enough to accompany any evaluation on such a resource and separate reproducible effects from differences the evaluation cannot resolve.
Fast and accurate segmentation of Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) lesions is essential for stroke prognosis and treatment planning. Non-contrast CT (NCCT), the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing ischemic infarcts, exhibits subtle infarct contrast, making manual delineation slow and labor-intensive. Motivated by this, and by the clinical practice of comparing brain hemispheres to localize infarcts, we propose a two-stage, nnU-Net-compatible 3D segmentation method. The first stage corrects head tilt to align each scan to its true anatomical mid-sagittal plane; the second applies a novel Asymmetric Feature Extraction (AsymFeX) module, comparing each voxel to its true contralateral counterpart within a local 3 x 3 x 3 neighborhood via cross-hemispheric attention, feature disparity estimation, and dual-scale gating to capture both large and small infarcts. On AISD, our method achieves 0.6796 Dice, 23.53 mm HD95, and 7.69 mL AVD, significantly outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods, with clinically relevant volumetric analysis at the 70 mL thrombolysis-eligibility threshold. Proof-of-concept evaluation on ATLAS v2.1 and ISLES'24 demonstrates that the same symmetry-driven design generalizes across imaging modalities and stroke time points without architectural changes, further supported by an uncertainty analysis assessing reliability under clinical deployment. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/biomedia-lab/AIS-detection.
Underwater color restoration promises to unlock color as a reliable signal for aquatic sciences, but achieving this with scientific confidence remains out of reach. Current methods are validated almost exclusively on an empirical basis, which provides confidence only to the extent that the vast diversity of possible visibility conditions is covered with end-to-end testing using a known ground truth. This is exacerbated by color restoration being a fatally ill-posed problem when considered in full mathematical generality, requiring additional constraints to narrow the solution to a finite uncertainty interval. The gap between which constraints suffice in theory and which constraints are satisfied by real-world data is poorly understood, making it unclear whether existing methods are solving a problem that is actually solvable. In this article, we investigate the theoretical side of this gap, identifying idealized conditions which guarantee bounded uncertainty that converges to zero as the spatial resolution of the camera increases.