Deep-learning features excel in visual matching, yet their practical value in tightly coupled visual-inertial SLAM (VI-SLAM) remains insufficiently characterized. We present DL-VINS-Factory, a unified framework that integrates learned feature extractors (ALIKED, RaCo, SuperPoint, XFeat) with either Lucas--Kanade (LK) optical-flow tracking or LightGlue (LG) descriptor matching. All front-ends share a sliding-window Ceres back-end, with optional AnyLoc DINOv2-VLAD loop closure, and 4-DoF pose-graph optimization. We benchmark the system across the four datasets covering indoor, unstructured outdoor, aggressive-motion, and visually degraded conditions. Results show that learned front-ends are viable for real-time embedded VI-SLAM, but are not universally superior to classical tracking. Relative to the corresponding GFTT+LK baseline, ALIKED+LG reduces EuRoC ATE by $5\%$ in monocular odometry and by $7\%$ in stereo with loop-closure. On NTU-VIRAL, where aggressive aerial motion increases inter-frame viewpoint change, ALIKED+LG stereo reduces loop-closed ATE by $12\%$. In Botanic Garden dataset, optical-flow tracking remains preferable, but learned keypoints still improve over the baseline GFTT, in which SuperPoint+LK reduces grayscale camera ATE by $29\%$, while RaCo+LK reduces RGB camera ATE by $38\%$. On SubT-MRS, learned front-ends display varying degree of improvement based on individual cases. With TensorRT acceleration on a Jetson AGX Orin, all valid configurations run in real time between $29$--$47$ FPS in monocular mode and $18$--$33$ FPS in stereo mode for the EuRoC and NTU-VIRAL datasets. AnyLoc further confirms roughly $2$--$7\times$ more valid loops than BRIEF+DBoW2. The implementation is open-sourced at https://github.com/limshoonkit/DL-VINS-Factory-ROS2/.
Roberto Corlito, Fabian Schmidt, Nils Seibert +3cs.RO cs.CV
Autonomous navigation of quadrupedal robots in diverse environments fundamentally relies on resilient Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). While visual-inertial SLAM has matured across wheeled, handheld, and aerial platforms, a critical evaluation gap remains regarding how hardware-level sensor configurations affect performance under the aggressive dynamics of legged locomotion. Quadrupeds introduce distinct embodiment-induced sensory challenges, including foot-impact shocks, high-frequency mechanical vibrations, and rapid angular rotations, which degrade standard perception pipelines. To address this gap, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art visual, visual-inertial, and LiDAR-visual-inertial SLAM methods using the GrandTour dataset recorded on an ANYmal D quadruped. We isolate and quantify the impacts of camera modalities, shutter techniques, and inertial sensor tiers, analyzing their trade-offs across localization accuracy, algorithmic robustness, and computational resource utilization. Our empirical findings demonstrate that hardware selection has substantial influence on system resilience: stereo configurations consistently outperform monocular and RGB-D modalities, global shutter cameras significantly mitigate motion-induced tracking failures compared to rolling shutter cameras, and, crucially, standard inertial integration can degrade the performance of primarily vision-based frameworks under harsh legged locomotion. These insights additionally offer concrete design guidelines for tailoring custom sensor payloads to achieve dependable perception on agile legged systems.